Comparison Overview

Anysphere

VS

Pitney Bowes

Anysphere

None
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

We're Anysphere, the team behind Cursor. Our mission is to automate coding. Our approach is to build the engineer of the future: a human-AI programmer that's an order of magnitude more effective than any one programmer. This hybrid engineer will have effortless control over their codebase and no low-entropy keystrokes. They will iterate at the speed of their judgment, even in the most complex systems. Using a combination of AI and human ingenuity, they will out-smart and out-engineer the best pure-AI system. We are a group of researchers and engineers. We build software and models to invent at the edge of what's useful and what's possible. Cursor has already improved the lives of millions of programmers.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,393
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Pitney Bowes

27 Waterview Dr, Shelton, 06484, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Pitney Bowes is a technology-driven company that provides digital shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world – including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entities rely on Pitney Bowes to reduce the complexity of sending mail and parcels.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 12,782
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anysphereinc.jpeg
Anysphere
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pitney-bowes.jpeg
Pitney Bowes
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anysphere
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pitney Bowes
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anysphere in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pitney Bowes in 2026.

Incident History — Anysphere (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anysphere cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pitney Bowes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pitney Bowes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anysphereinc.jpeg
Anysphere
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Repository (GitHub/other platforms), Auto-execution via `.vscode/tasks.json` (Workspace Trust disabled), Prompt Injection in AI Code Assistants (Claude Code, etc.), WebSocket Authentication Bypass (CVE-2025-52882), SQL Injection (Postgres MCP), Path Traversal (Microsoft NLWeb), Open Redirect/Stored XSS (Base44)
Motivation: Supply chain compromise, Credential theft, Data exfiltration, System persistence, AI model manipulation (prompt injection)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Compromised Software Dependency, Manipulated Configuration Files (MCP), Social Engineering (Trusted Repository Abuse)
Motivation: Espionage, Intellectual Property Theft, Persistent Access, Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Shared Repository (GitHub), Local File Modification, MCP Configuration Poisoning, Supply Chain Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pitney-bowes.jpeg
Pitney Bowes
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2019
Type:Malware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Anysphere company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pitney Bowes company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Anysphere company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Pitney Bowes company.

In the current year, Pitney Bowes company and Anysphere company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Pitney Bowes company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Anysphere company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pitney Bowes company nor Anysphere company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pitney Bowes company nor Anysphere company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Anysphere company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Pitney Bowes company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Anysphere nor Pitney Bowes holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pitney Bowes company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Anysphere company.

Pitney Bowes company employs more people globally than Anysphere company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Anysphere nor Pitney Bowes holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Pitney Bowes holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Pitney Bowes holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Pitney Bowes holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Pitney Bowes holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anysphere nor Pitney Bowes holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.