Comparison Overview

Anysphere

VS

NetSuite

Anysphere

None
Last Update: 2026-01-25
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.anysphere.co

We're Anysphere, the team behind Cursor. Our mission is to automate coding. Our approach is to build the engineer of the future: a human-AI programmer that's an order of magnitude more effective than any one programmer. This hybrid engineer will have effortless control over their codebase and no low-entropy keystrokes. They will iterate at the speed of their judgment, even in the most complex systems. Using a combination of AI and human ingenuity, they will out-smart and out-engineer the best pure-AI system. We are a group of researchers and engineers. We build software and models to invent at the edge of what's useful and what's possible. Cursor has already improved the lives of millions of programmers.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 1,425
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

NetSuite

2300 Oracle Way, Austin, 78741, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.netsuite.com

Founded in 1998, Oracle NetSuite is the world’s first cloud company. For more than 25 years, NetSuite has helped businesses gain the insight, control, and agility to build and grow a successful business. First focused on financials and ERP, we now provide an AI-powered unified business system that includes inventory management, HR, professional services automation, and omnichannel commerce, used by more than 43,000 customers in 219 countries and dependent territories.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 16,597
Subsidiaries: 31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anysphereinc.jpeg
Anysphere
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netsuite.jpeg
NetSuite
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anysphere
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NetSuite
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anysphere in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NetSuite in 2026.

Incident History — Anysphere (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anysphere cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NetSuite (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NetSuite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anysphereinc.jpeg
Anysphere
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Repository (GitHub/other platforms), Auto-execution via `.vscode/tasks.json` (Workspace Trust disabled), Prompt Injection in AI Code Assistants (Claude Code, etc.), WebSocket Authentication Bypass (CVE-2025-52882), SQL Injection (Postgres MCP), Path Traversal (Microsoft NLWeb), Open Redirect/Stored XSS (Base44)
Motivation: Supply chain compromise, Credential theft, Data exfiltration, System persistence, AI model manipulation (prompt injection)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Compromised Software Dependency, Manipulated Configuration Files (MCP), Social Engineering (Trusted Repository Abuse)
Motivation: Espionage, Intellectual Property Theft, Persistent Access, Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Shared Repository (GitHub), Local File Modification, MCP Configuration Poisoning, Supply Chain Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netsuite.jpeg
NetSuite
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of software vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882)
Motivation: Extortion, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

NetSuite company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anysphere company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NetSuite company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Anysphere company.

In the current year, NetSuite company has reported more cyber incidents than Anysphere company.

NetSuite company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Anysphere company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NetSuite company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Anysphere company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NetSuite company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Anysphere company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Anysphere company and NetSuite company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Anysphere nor NetSuite holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NetSuite company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Anysphere company.

NetSuite company employs more people globally than Anysphere company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Anysphere nor NetSuite holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor NetSuite holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor NetSuite holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anysphere nor NetSuite holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anysphere nor NetSuite holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anysphere nor NetSuite holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References