Comparison Overview

Anvl

VS

NetSuite

Anvl

11787 Lantern Rd, Fishers, Indiana, 46038, US
Last Update: 2025-03-09 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://anvl.com

Excellent

Anvl helps unlock critical data in real-time by connecting frontline workers and supervisors, through a single platform. Anvl delivers real-time data to streamline processes, improve quality, and keep your frontline safe. Our in-app messaging provides in-the-moment guidance, alerts, and analytics, resulting in improved productivity, reduced costs, and time savings.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NetSuite

2300 Oracle Way, Austin, TX, 78741, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://www.netsuite.com

Founded in 1998, Oracle NetSuite is the world’s first cloud company. For more than 25 years, NetSuite has helped businesses gain the visibility, control and agility to build and grow a successful business. First focused on financials and ERP, we now provide an integrated system that also includes inventory management, HR, professional services automation and omnichannel commerce, used by more than 41,000 customers in 219 countries and dependent territories.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 19,727
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
10
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anvl.jpeg
Anvl
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netsuite.jpeg
NetSuite
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Anvl
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NetSuite
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anvl in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NetSuite in 2025.

Incident History — Anvl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anvl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NetSuite (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NetSuite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anvl.jpeg
Anvl
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netsuite.jpeg
NetSuite
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: malicious advertisements (malvertising), typosquatted domains, fake login pages, social engineering
Motivation: financial gain, data theft, fraud (e.g., unauthorized bookings), sale of credentials on dark web
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Anvl company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to NetSuite company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

NetSuite company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Anvl company has not reported any.

In the current year, NetSuite company has reported more cyber incidents than Anvl company.

Neither NetSuite company nor Anvl company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NetSuite company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Anvl company has not reported such incidents publicly.

NetSuite company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Anvl company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Anvl company nor NetSuite company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

NetSuite company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Anvl company.

NetSuite company employs more people globally than Anvl company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References