Comparison Overview

Anvl

VS

Alibaba Group

Anvl

11787 Lantern Rd, Fishers, Indiana, 46038, US
Last Update: 2025-03-09 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://anvl.com

Excellent

Anvl helps unlock critical data in real-time by connecting frontline workers and supervisors, through a single platform. Anvl delivers real-time data to streamline processes, improve quality, and keep your frontline safe. Our in-app messaging provides in-the-moment guidance, alerts, and analytics, resulting in improved productivity, reduced costs, and time savings.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Alibaba Group

Last Update: 2024-05-18 (UTC)

Fair

Between 500 and 600
http://www.alibabagroup.com

Alibaba Group’s mission is to make it easy to do business anywhere. The company aims to build the future infrastructure of commerce. It envisions its customers will meet, work and live at Alibaba and that it will be a good company lasting for 102 years. We pledged to reach carbon neutrality by 2030. By working with merchants and consumers, the company expects to slash carbon emissions by 1.5 gigatons across its digital ecosystem by 2035. Sign up for Alibaba news at alizi.la/signup

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 79,586
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anvl.jpeg
Anvl
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-alibaba-group.jpeg
Alibaba Group
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Anvl
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alibaba Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anvl in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alibaba Group in 2025.

Incident History — Anvl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anvl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alibaba Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alibaba Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anvl.jpeg
Anvl
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chinese-alibaba-group.jpeg
Alibaba Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Server-based data exfiltration
Motivation: Cyber espionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Elastic Search Engine Instances
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Anvl company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Alibaba Group company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Alibaba Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Anvl company has not reported any.

In the current year, Alibaba Group company and Anvl company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alibaba Group company nor Anvl company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Alibaba Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Anvl company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Alibaba Group company nor Anvl company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anvl company nor Alibaba Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Alibaba Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Anvl company.

Alibaba Group company employs more people globally than Anvl company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References