Comparison Overview

Anvl

VS

Amdocs

Anvl

11787 Lantern Rd, Fishers, Indiana, 46038, US
Last Update: 2025-03-09 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
http://anvl.com

Excellent

Anvl helps unlock critical data in real-time by connecting frontline workers and supervisors, through a single platform. Anvl delivers real-time data to streamline processes, improve quality, and keep your frontline safe. Our in-app messaging provides in-the-moment guidance, alerts, and analytics, resulting in improved productivity, reduced costs, and time savings.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amdocs

1390 Timberlake Manor Parkway, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
https://www.amdocs.com/about

We help those who build the future to make it amazing. In an era where new technologies are born every minute, and the demand for meaningful digital experiences has never been so intense, we unlock our customers’ innovative potential, empowering them to transform their boldest ideas into reality, and make billions of people feel like VIPs. Our 31,000 employees around the globe are here to accelerate our customers’ migration to the cloud, differentiate in the 5G era, digitalize and automate their operations, and provide end users with the next-generation communication and media experiences that make the world say wow. Listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, Amdocs had revenue of $4.58 billion in fiscal 2022.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 35,252
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anvl.jpeg
Anvl
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amdocs.jpeg
Amdocs
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Anvl
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amdocs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anvl in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amdocs in 2025.

Incident History — Anvl (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anvl cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amdocs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amdocs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anvl.jpeg
Anvl
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amdocs.jpeg
Amdocs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Anvl company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Amdocs company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Amdocs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anvl company.

In the current year, Amdocs company and Anvl company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Amdocs company nor Anvl company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Amdocs company nor Anvl company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Amdocs company nor Anvl company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anvl company nor Amdocs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Amdocs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Anvl company.

Amdocs company employs more people globally than Anvl company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References