Comparison Overview

Antilatency

VS

RDT Solutions

Antilatency

Franklinou Rousvelt, 140, Limassol, 3011, CY
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Antilatency specializes in multipurpose positional tracking system which easily integrates with any ecosystem: AR/VR, Robotics, Drones and Virtual Production. For instance, the system covers all needs (such as full-body tracking, multiplayer interaction, wireless setup and tracking area of any size and shape) for VR business applications. It also provides accurate camera tracking and is compatible with the most popular software for virtual production.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RDT Solutions

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

RDT Solutions is a data storage and backup solutions provider with a focus on data protection. We know that you have many choices when choosing a business partner for your data storage needs. We screen manufacturers´ offerings continuously to make sure that we are offering the best products for overall reliability, support, and value so you can be confident that you are making the right decisions for your back office and enterprise needs. Give us a call today at 800-707-8105.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/antilatency.jpeg
Antilatency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rdt-solutions.jpeg
RDT Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Antilatency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RDT Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Antilatency in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Hardware Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RDT Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Antilatency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Antilatency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RDT Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RDT Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/antilatency.jpeg
Antilatency
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rdt-solutions.jpeg
RDT Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

RDT Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Antilatency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RDT Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Antilatency company.

In the current year, RDT Solutions company and Antilatency company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RDT Solutions company nor Antilatency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RDT Solutions company nor Antilatency company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RDT Solutions company nor Antilatency company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Antilatency company nor RDT Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Antilatency nor RDT Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Antilatency company nor RDT Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Antilatency company employs more people globally than RDT Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Hardware.

Neither Antilatency nor RDT Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Antilatency nor RDT Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Antilatency nor RDT Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Antilatency nor RDT Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Antilatency nor RDT Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Antilatency nor RDT Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H