Comparison Overview

APJ Solicitors

VS

Walker Pender Lawyers

APJ Solicitors

APJ Solicitors, Warrington, Daresbury, WA1 1RW, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

APJ Solicitors is a team of experts dedicated to investigating, negotiating and settling a broad range of claims against a wide variety of financial services providers. Our specialist solicitors only undertake this type of work which means they are solely focussed on this area of law and are completely familiar with all the issues that surround the mis-selling of financial products. Our team have over 40 years’ experience in challenging banks, advisors, lenders and investment providers regarding their negligent advice and services. Our technical expertise underpins our drive and determination to fight hard for your rights and acquire financial redress. We are client-orientated with a forward-thinking approach to providing expert legal advice to ensure that we support you efficiently and effectively, ensuring your journey is seamless from beginning to end.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Walker Pender Lawyers

28 Nicholas Street, Ipswich, QLD, 4305, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

With roots dating back to 1874, Walker Pender Lawyers stands as one of the oldest and most enduring legal institutions in Queensland. Walker Pender is a legal and professional services firm committed to delivering top-tier service for personal and professional matters. As a versatile generalist practice, we excel in a wide range of legal areas, from family law and estate planning to commercial litigation and property transactions. Our mission is simple — your success is our success. We prioritize open communication, tailored strategies, and an unwavering commitment to ensuring the best possible outcomes for our clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anthony-philip-james-&-co-ltd.jpeg
APJ Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker-pender-group.jpeg
Walker Pender Lawyers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
APJ Solicitors
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Walker Pender Lawyers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for APJ Solicitors in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walker Pender Lawyers in 2025.

Incident History — APJ Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

APJ Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Walker Pender Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walker Pender Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anthony-philip-james-&-co-ltd.jpeg
APJ Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walker-pender-group.jpeg
Walker Pender Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Walker Pender Lawyers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to APJ Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Walker Pender Lawyers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to APJ Solicitors company.

In the current year, Walker Pender Lawyers company and APJ Solicitors company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Walker Pender Lawyers company nor APJ Solicitors company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Walker Pender Lawyers company nor APJ Solicitors company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Walker Pender Lawyers company nor APJ Solicitors company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither APJ Solicitors company nor Walker Pender Lawyers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither APJ Solicitors nor Walker Pender Lawyers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither APJ Solicitors company nor Walker Pender Lawyers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Walker Pender Lawyers company employs more people globally than APJ Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither APJ Solicitors nor Walker Pender Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither APJ Solicitors nor Walker Pender Lawyers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither APJ Solicitors nor Walker Pender Lawyers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither APJ Solicitors nor Walker Pender Lawyers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither APJ Solicitors nor Walker Pender Lawyers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither APJ Solicitors nor Walker Pender Lawyers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X