Comparison Overview

Antequem, SL

VS

We The Curious

Antequem, SL

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.antequem.cat

Proposta global de gestió del patrimoni cultural, amb integració de diverses disciplines professionals. Coneixement i experiències són els objectius finals de la nostra activitat. Estudiem el llegat històric dels nostres avantpassats, vetllem per la seva preservació i posem en valor el patrimoni al servei de la societat, perquè la gent gaudeixi i comprengui els seus orígens. Antequem, SL és una empresa formada per un equip amb àmplia trajectòria en arqueologia, el patrimoni històric i artístic, els museus, la didàctica i el turisme cultural. Des de l’any 2006 integrem àmbits professionalment molt diversos que complementen el conjunt de projectes al servei del patrimoni cultural.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

We The Curious

One Millennium Square, Bristol, BS15DB, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://wethecurious.org

We The Curious is an educational charity on Bristol Harbourside and South West England’s leading science centre. Our vision is of a future where everyone is included, curious and inspired by science to build a better world, together. Our interactive experience is a safe and welcoming place for people to get creative, ask questions and explore different ideas. We develop inclusive learning programmes with and for local people, from our youth careers programme to school trips for over 60,000 children a year. We partner with universities, schools and community groups to support people to explore their curiosity, make connections, improve their confidence and wellbeing. We believe that science is a shared human activity full of challenging questions, different perspectives and positive action that can transform lives. All that begins with curiosity and the power of asking what if…

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 148
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/antequem-sl.jpeg
Antequem, SL
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wethecurious.jpeg
We The Curious
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Antequem, SL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
We The Curious
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Antequem, SL in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for We The Curious in 2026.

Incident History — Antequem, SL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Antequem, SL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — We The Curious (X = Date, Y = Severity)

We The Curious cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/antequem-sl.jpeg
Antequem, SL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wethecurious.jpeg
We The Curious
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Antequem, SL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to We The Curious company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, We The Curious company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Antequem, SL company.

In the current year, We The Curious company and Antequem, SL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither We The Curious company nor Antequem, SL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither We The Curious company nor Antequem, SL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither We The Curious company nor Antequem, SL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Antequem, SL company nor We The Curious company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Antequem, SL nor We The Curious holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Antequem, SL company nor We The Curious company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

We The Curious company employs more people globally than Antequem, SL company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Antequem, SL nor We The Curious holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor We The Curious holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor We The Curious holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor We The Curious holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor We The Curious holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor We The Curious holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References