Comparison Overview

Antequem, SL

VS

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts

Antequem, SL

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

Proposta global de gestió del patrimoni cultural, amb integració de diverses disciplines professionals. Coneixement i experiències són els objectius finals de la nostra activitat. Estudiem el llegat històric dels nostres avantpassats, vetllem per la seva preservació i posem en valor el patrimoni al servei de la societat, perquè la gent gaudeixi i comprengui els seus orígens. Antequem, SL és una empresa formada per un equip amb àmplia trajectòria en arqueologia, el patrimoni històric i artístic, els museus, la didàctica i el turisme cultural. Des de l’any 2006 integrem àmbits professionalment molt diversos que complementen el conjunt de projectes al servei del patrimoni cultural.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts

Little Rock, US
Last Update: 2026-01-24
Between 750 and 799

The Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts is home to a renowned art collection, an expansive Art School, and exceptional performing arts experiences. Serving the state of Arkansas and beyond, AMFA is committed to providing enriching cultural experiences for all. Founded in 1960, its mission is to ensure that learning, inspiration and creative expression in the arts flourish throughout Arkansas, for people of all ages and backgrounds.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/antequem-sl.jpeg
Antequem, SL
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-museum-of-fine-arts.jpeg
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Antequem, SL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Antequem, SL in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts in 2026.

Incident History — Antequem, SL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Antequem, SL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/antequem-sl.jpeg
Antequem, SL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arkansas-museum-of-fine-arts.jpeg
Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Antequem, SL company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Antequem, SL company.

In the current year, Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company and Antequem, SL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company nor Antequem, SL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company nor Antequem, SL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company nor Antequem, SL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Antequem, SL company nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Antequem, SL nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Antequem, SL company nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts company employs more people globally than Antequem, SL company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Antequem, SL nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Antequem, SL nor Arkansas Museum of Fine Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.