Comparison Overview

Anselm Academic

VS

Universitetsforlaget

Anselm Academic

702 Terrace Heights, Winona, MN 55987, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We have one principal motive: to publish texts that combine modern scholarship with effective pedagogy in order to promote critical thought, inquiry, dialogue, and the application of knowledge to contemporary questions. Our mission is inspired by Saint John Baptist de La Salle (1651–1719), founder of the Christian Brothers and patron saint of teachers, and by the scores of Lasallian educators who have continued his legacy by providing students with an education that matters and promotes human flourishing. In short, Anselm Academic exists to serve you and your desire for accessible and engaging books written by teaching scholars who share your dedication to educating college students.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Universitetsforlaget

Sehesteds gate 3, Oslo, 0105, NO
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Universitetsforlaget AS er et bok- og tidsskriftforlag som utvikler og utgir faglitteratur av høy kvalitet. Forlaget har en ledende posisjon, og våre forfattere er blant landets fremste på sine fagfelt. Universitetsforlagets overordnete mål uttrykkes i visjonen: Vi skal sette varige spor i det norske kunnskapssamfunnet. Det innebærer at våre utgivelser skal være meningsbærende og relevante. Det betyr også at vi aktivt utforsker nye publiseringskanaler. Ny tid og ny teknologi gjør at behovet for nye publiseringsformer blir sterkere. For å sette varige spor, som tåler kritiske blikk og tidens tann, må Universitetsforlaget derfor velge sine satsingsområder med omhu, i nær og aktiv kontakt med forfatterne, bokhandlerne og andre samarbeidspartnere. Vi må utvise lydhørhet, originalitet, godt skjønn og en stor porsjon mot. Sporene etter Universitetsforlaget, med sin lett gjenkjennelige U-logo, skal signalisere: Mot, engasjement, refleksjon og profesjonalitet. Universitetsforlaget er et fremtidsrettet forlag med dype og solide røtter i det beste av norsk fagforlagstradisjon. Forlaget har to ulike utspring: det ene kommer fra Tønnes Andenæs som tok initiativet til Universitetsforlaget i 1950. Det andre stammer fra 1982 da Aschehoug overtok forlaget Tanum-Norli, som da ble et fag- og lærebokforlag med navnet Tano. Tano og deler av Universitetsforlaget slo seg sammen i 2000. Forlaget er et heleid datterselskap av Aschehoug. Universitetsforlaget ledes av forlagssjef Hege Gundersen og har 41 engasjerte ansatte. Hvert år utgir vi 140 nye og reviderte boktitler og 55 tidsskrifter. Og backlist rommer imponerende 1600 titler. Alt dette, og mye mer, finner du på disse nettsidene.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anselm-academic.jpeg
Anselm Academic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universitetsforlaget.jpeg
Universitetsforlaget
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anselm Academic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Universitetsforlaget
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anselm Academic in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Universitetsforlaget in 2025.

Incident History — Anselm Academic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anselm Academic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Universitetsforlaget (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Universitetsforlaget cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anselm-academic.jpeg
Anselm Academic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/universitetsforlaget.jpeg
Universitetsforlaget
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Anselm Academic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Universitetsforlaget company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Universitetsforlaget company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anselm Academic company.

In the current year, Universitetsforlaget company and Anselm Academic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Universitetsforlaget company nor Anselm Academic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Universitetsforlaget company nor Anselm Academic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Universitetsforlaget company nor Anselm Academic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anselm Academic company nor Universitetsforlaget company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anselm Academic nor Universitetsforlaget holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Anselm Academic company nor Universitetsforlaget company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Universitetsforlaget company employs more people globally than Anselm Academic company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Anselm Academic nor Universitetsforlaget holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor Universitetsforlaget holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor Universitetsforlaget holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor Universitetsforlaget holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor Universitetsforlaget holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor Universitetsforlaget holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.