Comparison Overview

Anselm Academic

VS

The Fisher Company

Anselm Academic

702 Terrace Heights, Winona, MN 55987, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

We have one principal motive: to publish texts that combine modern scholarship with effective pedagogy in order to promote critical thought, inquiry, dialogue, and the application of knowledge to contemporary questions. Our mission is inspired by Saint John Baptist de La Salle (1651–1719), founder of the Christian Brothers and patron saint of teachers, and by the scores of Lasallian educators who have continued his legacy by providing students with an education that matters and promotes human flourishing. In short, Anselm Academic exists to serve you and your desire for accessible and engaging books written by teaching scholars who share your dedication to educating college students.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Fisher Company

PO Box 89578, Tucson, AZ, 85752, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The Fisher Company provides international mergers and acquisitions services for print and digital publishing, media, and technology sectors. As a client-focused company, we work closely with you on valuations, exit strategies, divestitures, or acquisitions, always with absolute discretion. Our experience is from both sides of the table, as we have owned, managed, bought, and sold multiple successful businesses. Our contacts include thousands of qualified potential buyers and investors.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anselm-academic.jpeg
Anselm Academic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fisher-company.jpeg
The Fisher Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anselm Academic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Fisher Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anselm Academic in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Fisher Company in 2025.

Incident History — Anselm Academic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anselm Academic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Fisher Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Fisher Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anselm-academic.jpeg
Anselm Academic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-fisher-company.jpeg
The Fisher Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Anselm Academic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Fisher Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Fisher Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anselm Academic company.

In the current year, The Fisher Company company and Anselm Academic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Fisher Company company nor Anselm Academic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Fisher Company company nor Anselm Academic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Fisher Company company nor Anselm Academic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anselm Academic company nor The Fisher Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anselm Academic nor The Fisher Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Anselm Academic company nor The Fisher Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Fisher Company company employs more people globally than Anselm Academic company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Anselm Academic nor The Fisher Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor The Fisher Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor The Fisher Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor The Fisher Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor The Fisher Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anselm Academic nor The Fisher Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.