Comparison Overview

Annual Giving Network

VS

Fundraising Direct

Annual Giving Network

undefined, Greater Boston Area, MA, 02052, US
Last Update: 2025-12-19

As the world’s leading resource for annual giving programs, AGN helps educational institutions develop sustainable sources of philanthropic support. We’re proud to have served thousands of colleges, universities and independent schools through our research, training, and consulting services, and through our membership program, which provides ongoing access to professional development. Learn more at AnnualGivingNetwork.com

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fundraising Direct

60 rue St Jacques, Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 1L5, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-20

At Fundraising Direct we are passionate about innovation and creativity. We deliver fundraising solutions that drive progress and and support the mission of our clients, the leading not-for profit organizations and charities in Canada including UNICEF, Medecins Sans Frontieres, the Canadian Red Cross and WWF. We believe in a donor-centric approach and put the supporter relationship at the centre of everything we do. Your mission, data and supporter insights drive the execution across all channels, including out of home, digital, direct mail and telephone. Do you want to make a difference? Join our team of dynamic and goal-oriented telephone fundraisers. MISSION To deliver creative solutions that exceed our clients’ expectations and fundraising goals VISION A community of prosperous and progressive not-for-profit organizations achieving success VALUES To pursue creativity and innovation driven by strategic insights and data analysis To act with dignity and respect To deepen the supporter relationship and their engagement journey To value every donation and gift of every size and impact To convey enthusiasm and pride in everything we do

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/annual-giving-network.jpeg
Annual Giving Network
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fundraising-direct.jpeg
Fundraising Direct
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Annual Giving Network
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fundraising Direct
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Annual Giving Network in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fundraising Direct in 2025.

Incident History — Annual Giving Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Annual Giving Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fundraising Direct (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fundraising Direct cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/annual-giving-network.jpeg
Annual Giving Network
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fundraising-direct.jpeg
Fundraising Direct
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fundraising Direct company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Annual Giving Network company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fundraising Direct company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Annual Giving Network company.

In the current year, Fundraising Direct company and Annual Giving Network company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fundraising Direct company nor Annual Giving Network company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fundraising Direct company nor Annual Giving Network company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fundraising Direct company nor Annual Giving Network company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Annual Giving Network company nor Fundraising Direct company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Annual Giving Network nor Fundraising Direct holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Annual Giving Network company nor Fundraising Direct company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fundraising Direct company employs more people globally than Annual Giving Network company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Annual Giving Network nor Fundraising Direct holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Annual Giving Network nor Fundraising Direct holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Annual Giving Network nor Fundraising Direct holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Annual Giving Network nor Fundraising Direct holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Annual Giving Network nor Fundraising Direct holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Annual Giving Network nor Fundraising Direct holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N