Comparison Overview

Annexair

VS

Bryant Rubber Corporation

Annexair

253 Energie St., St-Germain-de-Grantham, Quebec, J0C 1K0, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Annexair is a privately held North American company focused exclusively on designing and manufacturing high-quality, energy-efficient air handling systems. The majority of our product lines incorporate a variety of advanced energy recovery technologies which are designed for commercial, institutional and industrial applications. Relying on our team of creative and qualified employees who are involved in everything from the design to the manufacturing of our products, Annexair continually strives to exceed customer expectations in terms of quality and performance of the units. We are continuously striving to be an industry-leading green contributor by offering energy saving solutions that reflect the LEED philosophy. Founded in the late 90’s, Annexair was able to stand out as a North-American company and became today an important player in the HVAC industry.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 173
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bryant Rubber Corporation

1580 W Carson St, Long Beach, California, 90810, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Bryant Rubber Corporation manufactures precision molded, custom rubber components using natural and synthetic elastomers, such as Liquid Silicone Rubber (LSR), Ethylene Propylene (EPDM), Isoprene, Nitrile and many more. Our manufacturing capabilities include Injection, Transfer & Compression Molding, as well as secondary operations such as Cryogenic De-Flashing and Functional Testing. The products we manufacture can be found in lifesaving medical equipment, personal and commercial vehicles, home appliances, and even fighter jets!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/annexair.jpeg
Annexair
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bryant-rubber.jpeg
Bryant Rubber Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Annexair
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bryant Rubber Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Annexair in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bryant Rubber Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Annexair (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Annexair cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bryant Rubber Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bryant Rubber Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/annexair.jpeg
Annexair
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bryant-rubber.jpeg
Bryant Rubber Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Annexair company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bryant Rubber Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bryant Rubber Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Annexair company.

In the current year, Bryant Rubber Corporation company and Annexair company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bryant Rubber Corporation company nor Annexair company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bryant Rubber Corporation company nor Annexair company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bryant Rubber Corporation company nor Annexair company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Annexair company nor Bryant Rubber Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Annexair nor Bryant Rubber Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Annexair company nor Bryant Rubber Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Annexair company employs more people globally than Bryant Rubber Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Annexair nor Bryant Rubber Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Annexair nor Bryant Rubber Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Annexair nor Bryant Rubber Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Annexair nor Bryant Rubber Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Annexair nor Bryant Rubber Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Annexair nor Bryant Rubber Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H