Comparison Overview

Annatto

VS

Design Image

Annatto

undefined, Marietta, GA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Annatto is a branding, graphic design, and marketing agency located in Marietta, GA. We specialize in creating and maintaining brands through thoughtful, message-driven design. Add value to your business with clear and consistent messaging. Design creates a first impression, communicates value and establishes a relationship. With this in mind, we provide a full spectrum of services to ensure that our clients maximize their marketing impact and stay true to their brand. We approach each project with one goal in mind: to visually communicate an idea in a simple, straightforward and eye-catching manner. We have the experience and expertise to see each project through from concept to completion. Whether it is digital marketing, website development, printed collateral, or an environmental graphic, we work in partnership with our clients to provide the best possible solution.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Design Image

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

Design Image was formed in 1985 by 3 partners, John McEvoy and Dara O’Doherty and Cliona MacDonnell, in 1985, all Bachelor of Design Graduates from the National College of Art & Design. Design Image has successfully grown over the last 27 years and has established a clear understanding of client and consumer needs. The principle reason for the company’s success has been its ability to provide clients with the highest standards of design services in the time and manner in which they require them. The company’s workload is widely varied and includes private and public sector clients. Over the years Design image, along with successful corporate clients, has gained an award winning reputation in the areas of marketing property and publishing in Ireland.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/annatto.jpeg
Annatto
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-image.jpeg
Design Image
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Annatto
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Design Image
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Annatto in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Image in 2025.

Incident History — Annatto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Annatto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Design Image (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Image cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/annatto.jpeg
Annatto
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-image.jpeg
Design Image
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Design Image company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Annatto company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Design Image company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Annatto company.

In the current year, Design Image company and Annatto company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Design Image company nor Annatto company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Design Image company nor Annatto company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Design Image company nor Annatto company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Annatto company nor Design Image company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Annatto nor Design Image holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Annatto company nor Design Image company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Design Image company employs more people globally than Annatto company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Annatto nor Design Image holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Annatto nor Design Image holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Annatto nor Design Image holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Annatto nor Design Image holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Annatto nor Design Image holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Annatto nor Design Image holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X