Comparison Overview

Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park

VS

Niagara History Center

Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park

723 Second Street, Annapolis, 21403, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park educates youth and adults about the Annapolis area’s rich maritime heritage and the ecology of the Chesapeake Bay through programs, exhibits and community events. We accomplish this mission through an engaging suite of hands-on programming and by bringing visitors to our unique location, at the mouth of Back Creek overlooking the Chesapeake Bay. The Education Center at the AMM’s Park Campus annually serves more than 12,000 students and adults. We aim to help construct a connection between people and the environment by leading hands-on activities that foster positive outdoor experiences and help stimulate critical thinking. These experiences can help establish a foundation for future sustainable environmental decision making. AMM offers four free core programs, as well as field trips, family programs, afterschool, summer camp, and more. The Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park (AMM) is a major community asset serving Anne Arundel County and beyond. A volunteer board of 16 distinguished community members and a professional staff oversee the operations and long-range planning for this tax-exempt 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. We are also proud to say our thriving cohort of over 350 volunteers is involved in all aspects of the Museum’s functions.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Niagara History Center

215 Niagara St, Lockport, 14094, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Niagara History Center is dedicated to the preservation, promotion, and interpretation of the diverse cultural heritage of the people, places, and events related to Niagara County and the Erie Canal. It spans three properties and seven buildings in historic Lockport: the main campus at 215 Niagara Street, the Col. William Bond/Jesse Hawley House at 143 Ontario Street, and The Erie Canal Discovery Center at 24 Church Street.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/annapolis-maritime-museum.jpeg
Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niagara-history-center.jpeg
Niagara History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Niagara History Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niagara History Center in 2026.

Incident History — Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Niagara History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niagara History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/annapolis-maritime-museum.jpeg
Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niagara-history-center.jpeg
Niagara History Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company and Niagara History Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Niagara History Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company.

In the current year, Niagara History Center company and Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Niagara History Center company nor Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Niagara History Center company nor Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Niagara History Center company nor Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company nor Niagara History Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park nor Niagara History Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company nor Niagara History Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park company employs more people globally than Niagara History Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park nor Niagara History Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park nor Niagara History Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park nor Niagara History Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park nor Niagara History Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park nor Niagara History Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Annapolis Maritime Museum & Park nor Niagara History Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H