Comparison Overview

Anna Jaques Hospital

VS

Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust

Anna Jaques Hospital

25 Highland Ave , None, Newburyport, MA, US, 01950
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Anna Jaques Hospital is a not-for-profit community hospital serving the Merrimack Valley, North Shore and Southern New Hampshire. Our mission is to provide measurably high quality medical care, in alliance with our medical staff. Anna Jaques is recognized for delivering high quality community health care at a lower cost, with an emphasis on patient satisfaction. The hospital is clinically affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), a Boston academic medical center and major teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 661
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust

Westminster Bridge Road, London, GB, SE1 7EH
Last Update: 2025-11-27

One of the largest Trusts in the UK, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust comprises five of the UK’s best known hospitals – Guy’s, St Thomas’, Evelina London Children’s Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield – as well as community services in Lambeth and Southwark, all with a long history of high quality care, clinical excellence, research and innovation. We work closely with a wide range of health and care partners to deliver the best care to our local population, and we play an active role in the integrated care systems (ICS) in south east and north west London. We have a long tradition of clinical and scientific achievement and – as part of King’s Health Partners – we are one of England’s eight academic health sciences centres (AHSCs), bringing together world-class clinical services, teaching and research. We are rated Good overall by the Care Quality Commission, and have one of the lowest mortality rates in the country. With around 23,700 staff, we are one of the largest employers locally. We aim to reflect the diversity of the local communities we serve and continue to develop new and existing partnerships with local people, patients, neighbouring NHS organisations, local authorities and charitable bodies and GPs. The dedication and skills of our employees lie at the heart of our organisation. We strive to recruit and retain the best staff to ensure that our services are high quality, safe and patient focused.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,100
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anna-jaques-hospital.jpeg
Anna Jaques Hospital
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guys-and-st-thomas-nhs-foundation-trust.jpeg
Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anna Jaques Hospital
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anna Jaques Hospital in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust in 2025.

Incident History — Anna Jaques Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anna Jaques Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anna-jaques-hospital.jpeg
Anna Jaques Hospital
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guys-and-st-thomas-nhs-foundation-trust.jpeg
Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anna Jaques Hospital company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Anna Jaques Hospital company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company has not reported any.

In the current year, Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company and Anna Jaques Hospital company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company nor Anna Jaques Hospital company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company nor Anna Jaques Hospital company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Anna Jaques Hospital company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Anna Jaques Hospital company nor Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anna Jaques Hospital nor Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Anna Jaques Hospital company.

Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust company employs more people globally than Anna Jaques Hospital company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Anna Jaques Hospital nor Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anna Jaques Hospital nor Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anna Jaques Hospital nor Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anna Jaques Hospital nor Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anna Jaques Hospital nor Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anna Jaques Hospital nor Guy's and St Thomas'​ NHS Foundation Trust holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H