Comparison Overview

Anna Design

VS

Buro Grondverf

Anna Design

undefined, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

AnnaDesign is a New York City–based design studio. The company has designed numerous award-winning logo, book, magazine, and package designs and continues to integrate a variety of mediums including web and iPad design. Whether it's art direction, branding, interactive design, typesetting, or complete book packaging, AnnaDesign will produce a meticulously thought-out, high-end product that results in successful sales and follow-up editions.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Buro Grondverf

Burgemeester Krollaan 68 Helmond, 5707BE, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Buro Grondverf | Peter-Paul Brans beschikt over een uitgebreide kennis betreffende 3D engineering en het uitwerken van eenvoudige tot complexe staalconstructies. Het uitwerken gebeurt volledig 3D / BIM model in Tekla Structures. Uit dit model worden tekeningen, lijsten en DSTV files gegenereerd. In 2008 & 2012 hebben we in combinatie met Moeskops Staalbouw de nationale staalprijs behaald met: # Nedtrain - Haarlem # Cleanrooms ASML 5D - Veldhoven # Nominatie staalprijs 2012: Floriade paviljoen - Azerbaijan. Onze specialiteit binnen de grafische vormgeving zijn stijlvolle websites. Deze worden altijd in een Joomla CMS systeem opgeleverd.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anna-design.jpeg
Anna Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buro-grondverf.jpeg
Buro Grondverf
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anna Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Buro Grondverf
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anna Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buro Grondverf in 2025.

Incident History — Anna Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anna Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Buro Grondverf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buro Grondverf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anna-design.jpeg
Anna Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buro-grondverf.jpeg
Buro Grondverf
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Buro Grondverf company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anna Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Buro Grondverf company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anna Design company.

In the current year, Buro Grondverf company and Anna Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Buro Grondverf company nor Anna Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Buro Grondverf company nor Anna Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Buro Grondverf company nor Anna Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anna Design company nor Buro Grondverf company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anna Design nor Buro Grondverf holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Anna Design company nor Buro Grondverf company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Anna Design company employs more people globally than Buro Grondverf company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Anna Design nor Buro Grondverf holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anna Design nor Buro Grondverf holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anna Design nor Buro Grondverf holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anna Design nor Buro Grondverf holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anna Design nor Buro Grondverf holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anna Design nor Buro Grondverf holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X