Comparison Overview

Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum

VS

California Academy of Sciences

Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum

220 E. Ann Street, Ann Arbor, undefined, 48104, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum (AAHOM) opened in 1982 in an historic firehouse in downtown Ann Arbor and quickly became the cornerstone of informal science education in the community. This was achieved by working with scientists, artists, designers, engineers, and innovators who transferred their extraordinary talents and knowledge into the creation of simple, effective science exhibits that can be understood by children, their families, and audiences of all ages. Following several expansions, AAHOM now occupies 40,000 square feet, with 20,000 devoted to exhibit space for 250+ interactive exhibits designed to promote science discovery and literacy. Over 6 million visitors have visited AAHOM since it first opened its doors, making it one of the most popular science centers in the State of Michigan. The mission of the AAHOM is to create moments of discovery that inspire curiosity, exploration, and respect for STEM, and the natural world . Our vision is a world where curiosity today leads to more purposeful lives tomorrow. Thanks to a steadfast belief in the power of STEaM when placed in the hands of pre-K through 8th Graders, we enjoy one of the highest annual attendance rates at a science center in Michigan: reaching nearly 400,000 each year. AAHOM education programs align with State of Michigan Grade Level Content Expectations (GLCE) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). Our exhibits have been displayed in libraries, community centers and shopping malls throughout the state. AAHOM’s regional and national reputation was built on its visionary planning and implementation of interactive STEaM-based exhibits; groundbreaking educational programs delivered to 47 counties throughout the state, 47 states across the country, and numerous countries around the world; and an exceptional ability to establish and maintain strong collaborative bonds with public and private organizations from a variety of disciplines.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

California Academy of Sciences

55 Music Concourse Dr., San Francisco, CA, 94118, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The California Academy of Sciences is a renowned scientific and educational institution dedicated to regenerating the natural world. Based in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park, it's the only place in the world to house an aquarium, planetarium, and natural history museum—as well as innovative programs in scientific research and education—all under one living roof. To find out more about our opportunities, visit our Careers page at calacademy.org/careers, or simply follow us here. The Academy is committed to cultivating a culturally inclusive environment where diversity of thought and expression are valued, respected, appreciated and celebrated. We believe in creating a culture where all individuals feel respected, are treated fairly, provided work-life balance, and have an opportunity to excel.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 756
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ann-arbor-hands-on-museum.jpeg
Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-academy-of-sciences.jpeg
California Academy of Sciences
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
California Academy of Sciences
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for California Academy of Sciences in 2026.

Incident History — Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — California Academy of Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

California Academy of Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ann-arbor-hands-on-museum.jpeg
Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/california-academy-of-sciences.jpeg
California Academy of Sciences
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

California Academy of Sciences company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, California Academy of Sciences company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company.

In the current year, California Academy of Sciences company and Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither California Academy of Sciences company nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither California Academy of Sciences company nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither California Academy of Sciences company nor Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company nor California Academy of Sciences company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum nor California Academy of Sciences holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company nor California Academy of Sciences company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

California Academy of Sciences company employs more people globally than Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum nor California Academy of Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum nor California Academy of Sciences holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum nor California Academy of Sciences holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum nor California Academy of Sciences holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum nor California Academy of Sciences holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ann Arbor Hands-On Museum nor California Academy of Sciences holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N