Comparison Overview

Anibella Ink + Paper

VS

HKD Sports

Anibella Ink + Paper

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Anibella Ink + Paper specializes in custom wedding invitations and stationery to fit your unique style and tastes. We pride ourselves on chic, fun and elegant design concepts, along with exceptional customer service. Contact us today by visiting www.anibella.biz for samples and more information, and let us make your paper details picture perfect for your event.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

HKD Sports

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

HKD Sports brings together a creative team of exhibit designers, graphic designers, lighting designers, media system designers, interpreters and project managers to create interpretive experiences for collegiate and professional sporting facilities. Through our experience, leadership and close collaboration with our clients, we develop multi-faceted visitor experiences that will captivate audiences of all ages and interest levels. We design powerful and interactive exhibits that will wow your visitors and can be easily monitored and maintained by your staff.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anibella-ink---paper.jpeg
Anibella Ink + Paper
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hkd-sports.jpeg
HKD Sports
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anibella Ink + Paper
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HKD Sports
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anibella Ink + Paper in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HKD Sports in 2025.

Incident History — Anibella Ink + Paper (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anibella Ink + Paper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — HKD Sports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HKD Sports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anibella-ink---paper.jpeg
Anibella Ink + Paper
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hkd-sports.jpeg
HKD Sports
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Anibella Ink + Paper company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HKD Sports company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, HKD Sports company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anibella Ink + Paper company.

In the current year, HKD Sports company and Anibella Ink + Paper company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither HKD Sports company nor Anibella Ink + Paper company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither HKD Sports company nor Anibella Ink + Paper company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither HKD Sports company nor Anibella Ink + Paper company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper company nor HKD Sports company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper nor HKD Sports holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper company nor HKD Sports company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper nor HKD Sports holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper nor HKD Sports holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper nor HKD Sports holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper nor HKD Sports holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper nor HKD Sports holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anibella Ink + Paper nor HKD Sports holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X