Comparison Overview

Angel One

VS

ICE

Angel One

G-1, Ackruti Trade Center, Road No -7, MIDC, Andheri (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 093
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Angel One Limited is a Fintech company providing broking services, margin trading facility, research services, depository services, investment education and distribution of third-party financial products to its clients, on a mission to become the No. 1 fintech organization in India. With about 32 million registered clients, we are onboarding, in the current financial year, an average of over 900K new clients every month. We are working to build personalized financial journeys for our clients via a single app, powered by new-age tech, AI, Machine Learning and Data Science. We are a group of self-driven, motivated individuals who enjoy taking ownership and believe in providing best value for money to investors through innovative products and investment strategies. We apply and amplify personalisation within our products and services. We have a flat structure, with ample opportunity to showcase your talent and a growth path for engineers to the very top. Join our team and experience the best of both worlds at Angel One! We believe in the power of collaboration and the freedom of flexibility. This year, we secured rank 20 among the top 100 Best Companies to Work for, in India in 2025; a big jump from rank 92 in 2022, from rank 52 in 2023, and rank 25 in 2024! We are aggressively hiring Engineers, Product Managers & Data science rockstars across India. Check out our careers section!

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11,702
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ICE

Atlanta, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

ICE (NYSE: ICE) connects people to data, technology and expertise that create opportunity and inspire innovation. For terms of use, visit www.ice.com/privacy-security-center/terms-of-use

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11,554
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/angelone.jpeg
Angel One
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icemarkets.jpeg
ICE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Angel One
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ICE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Angel One in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICE in 2025.

Incident History — Angel One (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Angel One cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ICE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/angelone.jpeg
Angel One
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icemarkets.jpeg
ICE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ICE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Angel One company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ICE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Angel One company.

In the current year, ICE company and Angel One company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ICE company nor Angel One company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ICE company nor Angel One company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ICE company nor Angel One company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Angel One company nor ICE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Angel One nor ICE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ICE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Angel One company.

Angel One company employs more people globally than ICE company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Angel One nor ICE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Angel One nor ICE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Angel One nor ICE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Angel One nor ICE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Angel One nor ICE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Angel One nor ICE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N