Comparison Overview

Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc

VS

Linemark Inc.

Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc

1400 West 57 street, Cleveland, Ohio, 44102-3044, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Specialties Fast Service, State-of-the-art Equipment, Worry Free! Printing solutions made easier at Angel Printing. With over 35 years experience in 4/5 Color Commercial Printing, our employees are at the top of their field & love what they do. We offer 1-day, or rush service, on many project, but fast turnaround is common on most projects. Printing available on Brochures, Postcard, Newsletters, Flyers, Catalogs, & Programs. Also offering, Invitations, Envelopes, Letterheads & Labels. Please ask what we can print for you, because you may be surprised. We are your Complete Source with Quick turn-around time, Friendly customer service at Competitive Pricing. Lower Cost + Less Time = Greater value to You! History Established in 1983. We have many years of experience in Printing. We continue to upgrade equipment and technology to meet today's needs.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Linemark Inc.

501 Prince Georges Blvd, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, 20774, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Linemark is a leading custom book printing and direct mail provider, specializing in variable, on-demand products for associations, corporations, and non-profit organizations. Our 90,000 sq. ft. headquarters—strategically located near both the Washington, D.C. and Baltimore metro areas—leverages cutting-edge technology and data-driven strategies to deliver measurable, personalized results. As one of the nation’s fastest-growing communications companies, Linemark sets the standard for innovative, customer-focused solutions designed to enhance engagement and drive success.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 123
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/angel-printing-and-reproduction-inc-.jpeg
Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linemark-printing.jpeg
Linemark Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Linemark Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Linemark Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Linemark Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Linemark Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/angel-printing-and-reproduction-inc-.jpeg
Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/linemark-printing.jpeg
Linemark Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Linemark Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Linemark Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company.

In the current year, Linemark Inc. company and Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Linemark Inc. company nor Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Linemark Inc. company nor Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Linemark Inc. company nor Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company nor Linemark Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc nor Linemark Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company nor Linemark Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Linemark Inc. company employs more people globally than Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc nor Linemark Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc nor Linemark Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc nor Linemark Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc nor Linemark Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc nor Linemark Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Angel Printing and Reproduction Inc nor Linemark Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N