Comparison Overview

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort

VS

Grand Villa Casino

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort

3438 Stoluckquamish Ln., Arlington, Washington, 98223, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Open since 2004, the business is home to 1,400 slot machines, a Sports Book, a wide variety of table games, two virtual sports gaming suites, and a bowling alley. The gaming and entertainment destination is complimented by a three-star hotel with 125 rooms, conference area, and a ballroom, as well as an assortment of dining options including both a high-end steakhouse and an award-winning microbrewery. Angel of the Winds Casino Resort is privately owned by the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians with over 700 of employees from the Northwest, Olympic, and South Puget Sound regions.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 341
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Grand Villa Casino

4331 Dominion St, Burnaby, V5G 1C7, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-24

An incomparable gaming, dining and entertainment experience awaits you at the Grand Villa Casino. And you’ll receive a welcome that befits our Guest of Honour at the Lower Mainland’s newest and largest gaming facility. Lose yourself in a soothing atmosphere created by rustic, golden hues and the majestic marble columns that evoke the sophisticated charm of an Italian Villa. The spacious gaming floor, spread over two levels, is alive with the energy of over 50 gaming tables and 1000 slot machines. With 100, 000 square feet of gaming space, two bars, restaurants and a show lounge, Grand Villa Casino will be your preferred destination for an unrivalled entertainment experience.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/angel-of-the-winds-casino.jpeg
Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-villa-casino.jpeg
Grand Villa Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Grand Villa Casino
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grand Villa Casino in 2025.

Incident History — Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Grand Villa Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grand Villa Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/angel-of-the-winds-casino.jpeg
Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/grand-villa-casino.jpeg
Grand Villa Casino
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Grand Villa Casino company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Grand Villa Casino company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company.

In the current year, Grand Villa Casino company and Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Grand Villa Casino company nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Grand Villa Casino company nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Grand Villa Casino company nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company nor Grand Villa Casino company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort nor Grand Villa Casino holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company nor Grand Villa Casino company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company employs more people globally than Grand Villa Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort nor Grand Villa Casino holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort nor Grand Villa Casino holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort nor Grand Villa Casino holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort nor Grand Villa Casino holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort nor Grand Villa Casino holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort nor Grand Villa Casino holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H