Comparison Overview

AndyMark Inc.

VS

Running Warehouse

AndyMark Inc.

1900 E North St, None, Kokomo, Indiana, US, 46901
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799

AndyMark develops, manufactures, and distributes mechanical and electrical parts for the mobile and competitive robotics market, focusing on robotics education. The AndyMark staff strives to support the FIRST Community and the robotics education market by developing and distributing essential components to robot builders and mobile robotics. In 2004, Andy Baker and Mark Koors formed AndyMark, Inc. working from their homes to grow the business, while continuing to work their day jobs as engineers at Delphi Automotive. In 2007, AndyMark became a tenant within the Inventrek technology park in Kokomo. In 2011, AndyMark moved to a 24,000 sq ft facility that was home until 2018. In May 2018 AndyMark moved operations to 1900 E. North St. in Kokomo, more than doubling their warehouse space. AndyMark was named "Business of the Year"​ in 2011 by the Kokomo Chamber of Commerce. In 2018, Senator Todd Young recognized AndyMark as Small Business of the Day during National Small Business Week. Currently, AndyMark is one of the leading distributors and makers of robotics parts within the robotics mobility and competition market. AndyMark's staff has over 200 years of FIRST team experience and provides staffing services to many robot competition events throughout the year. Our Kokomo, Indiana home offers a central location for quick distribution across North America, as well as international shipping to over 70+ countries.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Running Warehouse

181 Suburban Road, None, San Luis Obispo, CA, US, 93401
Last Update: 2025-12-28

Running Warehouse is America’s Finest Running Specialty Store. Our customers are dedicated runners who care about the sport and are looking for the latest products to help them perform at peak levels. We carefully select every product we carry, with the goal of offering only those products that will benefit athletes, competitors, and people who are serious about the sport of running. We carry running shoes from Nike, adidas, Altra, Asics, Brooks, INOV8, La Sportiva, Merrell, Mizuno, Montrail, New Balance, Newton, The North Face, Pearl Izumi, Salomon, Saucony and Zoot. We also carry running apparel from most of these brands along with BOA, Craft, CWX, GORE Running, Moving Comfort, Sugoi, Under Armour and 2XU. In the running accessories category, look to us for the latest in GPS watches, run watches, heart rate monitors, nutrition, hats and gloves, socks, and many other items to improve your running experience. We are committed to selecting educated, engaged staff members with a passion for running. If you are interested in a career with us, please get in touch online or apply in person in our retail store located at 181 Suburban Road in San Luis Obispo.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andymark-inc..jpeg
AndyMark Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/running-warehouse.jpeg
Running Warehouse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AndyMark Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Running Warehouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AndyMark Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Running Warehouse in 2025.

Incident History — AndyMark Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AndyMark Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Running Warehouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Running Warehouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andymark-inc..jpeg
AndyMark Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/running-warehouse.jpeg
Running Warehouse
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

AndyMark Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Running Warehouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Running Warehouse company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas AndyMark Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Running Warehouse company and AndyMark Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Running Warehouse company nor AndyMark Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Running Warehouse company has disclosed at least one data breach, while AndyMark Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Running Warehouse company nor AndyMark Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AndyMark Inc. company nor Running Warehouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AndyMark Inc. nor Running Warehouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AndyMark Inc. company nor Running Warehouse company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Running Warehouse company employs more people globally than AndyMark Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither AndyMark Inc. nor Running Warehouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AndyMark Inc. nor Running Warehouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AndyMark Inc. nor Running Warehouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AndyMark Inc. nor Running Warehouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AndyMark Inc. nor Running Warehouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AndyMark Inc. nor Running Warehouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X