Comparison Overview

Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement

VS

Wagner Blecher LLP

Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement

26 Missouri Avenue, Salford, England, M50 2NP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement is one of the UK’s leading High Court Enforcement and Certificated Bailiff operations. We specialise in the enforcement of judgment debt and regaining control of property and assets. Working for a range of businesses, including law firms, lenders, local authorities, landlords and property agents, we are completely focused on achieving maximum results at minimum further cost. Strongly committed to delivering the best service and results in the industry, we obtain payment in full and resolve more cases quicker than any other High Court Enforcement Office. Over the years, we have expanded from our home in Salford, Manchester to open additional offices in Leeds, Birmingham, Bristol and London, serving all major cities and beyond. Our principle services include: - Money judgment enforcement - Removal of trespassers - Tenant evictions & mortgage repossessions - Waste removal & cleaning - Commercial rent arrears recovery - Commercial lease forfeiture Why choose to work with Wilson & Roe? Our mission has always been to be the best at what we do. We set our expectations high to ensure we deliver consistently well on each instruction. We achieve this, principally, through our strong investment in our people. At Wilson & Roe we go to great lengths to attract, develop, engage and retain the best in our field of expertise, because that’s what makes us great. We believe that when you instruct Wilson & Roe you are entrusting us with your reputation and our approach to enforcement is in keeping with the ethos of our clients and is reflective of our professional and social responsibilities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wagner Blecher LLP

1999 S. Bascom Ave., Campbell, CA, 95008, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2007 by patent attorneys John Wagner and Matt Blecher, Wagner Blecher LLP is an intellectual property law firm specializing in patent prosecution services. We serve clients with advanced computer, electrical, electromechanical, and other high technology applications and are committed to protecting their investments in research and development. These clients include technology leaders that range from Fortune 100 companies to well-known mid-size companies, as well as high-tech startups. Our firm consists of veteran, collaborative law professionals who have worked together in a variety of capacities for many years. In addition to our founding partners, Wagner Blecher LLP also includes registered patent attorneys and patent agents, as well as patent engineers, with expertise in a wide range of technical specialties. Together, we have drafted and prosecuted several thousand patent applications in the fields of computer networking and communications, computer systems, digital and electronic devices, capacitive sensing devices, software, digital storage systems, semiconductor devices and device fabrication, medical devices, and many more advanced technologies. Our full-service capabilities and significant investments in operational technologies ensure that we can protect new inventions from the moment of creation, helping our clients build patent portfolios that suit their objectives by protecting core technology.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andrewwilsonandco.jpeg
Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wagner-blecher-llp.jpeg
Wagner Blecher LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wagner Blecher LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wagner Blecher LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wagner Blecher LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wagner Blecher LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andrewwilsonandco.jpeg
Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wagner-blecher-llp.jpeg
Wagner Blecher LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wagner Blecher LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wagner Blecher LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company.

In the current year, Wagner Blecher LLP company and Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wagner Blecher LLP company nor Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wagner Blecher LLP company nor Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wagner Blecher LLP company nor Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company nor Wagner Blecher LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement nor Wagner Blecher LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company nor Wagner Blecher LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement company employs more people globally than Wagner Blecher LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement nor Wagner Blecher LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement nor Wagner Blecher LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement nor Wagner Blecher LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement nor Wagner Blecher LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement nor Wagner Blecher LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wilson & Roe High Court Enforcement nor Wagner Blecher LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X