Comparison Overview

Andres Institute of Art

VS

Cultural Safeguard Alliance

Andres Institute of Art

PO Box 226, Brookline, NH, 03033, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Founded in 1998 by philanthropist Paul Andres along with world-renowned sculptor John Weidman, the Andres Institute of Art seeks to underline the interface between nature and art. It comprises a spacious workshop/studio on the upper slopes of Bear Mountain in Brookline, New Hampshire, along with 140 acres of beautiful woodland threaded by miles of nature trails along which artists from across the globe have placed more than 60 original works of art. The Institute is a non-profit, all-volunteer 501.c.3 charitable organization, and the Sculpture Park (New England's largest) is open free to the public 365 days a year during daylight hours. Each year the Institute sponsors and hosts the Bridges and Connections International Sculpture Symposium to bring together artists from different cultures for several weeks of fellowship, training and creativity. During their short tenure the artists learn new techniques, share their expertise and create original works of art which are added to the permanent collection of the Institute. While each symposium has a theme, artistic ideas are restricted only by each sculptor’s imagination and what is physically feasible in the limited time they have to create their works. There are no clients to please, no judges to impress. Andres is unique in that artists are given the freedom to create for art’s sake, and many return to produce more sculptures in subsequent years. The combination of rugged nature trails, outdoor hiking for fitness and viewing fine art from a variety of cultural backgrounds makes for a truly uncommon and inspiring family outing found nowhere else. Only an hour from Boston, it is one of the hidden gems of New England.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cultural Safeguard Alliance

470 James Street, Suite 007, New Haven, Connecticut, US, 06513
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Cultural Safeguard Alliance is a non-profit premier network dedicated to the protection and celebration of cultural heritage. As a free network with a complimentary platform, including validated memberships, we cater to the unique needs of operations, safety, and security professionals. The Cultural Safeguard Alliance encompasses a wide variety of cultural institutions such as museums, libraries, botanical gardens, aquariums, zoos, performance arts centers, historic sites, science centers, and beyond. Our Vision: We envision a world where every cultural treasure is preserved and respected for its historical significance. Our experts collaborate with cultural institutions globally to foster the implementation of top-tier strategies and best practices from the American Alliance of Museums and the Association of Zoos and Aquariums. Our Commitment: We are dedicated to the dual goal of preserving cultural legacies and building a robust network of professionals in cultural institutions, including operations, safety, and security. We keep our fingers on the pulse of real-time incidents, and we're all about nurturing collaboration and the exchange of knowledge among our members. Our Endeavor: By sharing the latest in policies, procedures, and logistical strategies, we aim to amplify the impact of cultural property protection. Only through our collective efforts can we ensure the enduring legacy of our cultural heritage. Join Today: Embrace the opportunity to be part of a network that values the richness and diversity of our shared past. Together, let's champion the cause of cultural safeguarding for the enjoyment and education of future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andres-institute-of-art.jpeg
Andres Institute of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culturalsafeguardalliance.jpeg
Cultural Safeguard Alliance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Andres Institute of Art
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cultural Safeguard Alliance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andres Institute of Art in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cultural Safeguard Alliance in 2025.

Incident History — Andres Institute of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andres Institute of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cultural Safeguard Alliance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cultural Safeguard Alliance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andres-institute-of-art.jpeg
Andres Institute of Art
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culturalsafeguardalliance.jpeg
Cultural Safeguard Alliance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Andres Institute of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cultural Safeguard Alliance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cultural Safeguard Alliance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Andres Institute of Art company.

In the current year, Cultural Safeguard Alliance company and Andres Institute of Art company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance company nor Andres Institute of Art company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance company nor Andres Institute of Art company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cultural Safeguard Alliance company nor Andres Institute of Art company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Andres Institute of Art company nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Andres Institute of Art nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Andres Institute of Art company nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Andres Institute of Art company employs more people globally than Cultural Safeguard Alliance company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Andres Institute of Art nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Andres Institute of Art nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Andres Institute of Art nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Andres Institute of Art nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Andres Institute of Art nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Andres Institute of Art nor Cultural Safeguard Alliance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X