Comparison Overview

Anaxi

VS

DR Gaming Technology™

Anaxi

10220 Aristocrat Way, Las Vegas, 89135, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Anaxi is creating a destination where players can enjoy the excitement of real money gaming with confidence. It’s live, real and ready to entertain. Proudly part of the Aristocrat family, we create gaming experiences that exceed expectations for our customers, players and industry partners, every time. Driven by excellence We’re exploring the new frontier of gaming with courage, creativity and a commitment to do things right. Curious for innovation Our creative and visionary minds are dreaming big, translating imagination into innovation and fearlessly exploring what’s next. Visionary gameplay No matter where or how people connect, through Anaxi they’ll discover an immersive and interactive gaming experience that always entertains. Website: https://www.anaxi.com/

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DR Gaming Technology™

Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 2003 by CEO Jurgen De Munck and CTO Michiel van Dam, DR Gaming Technology™ (DRGT™) is currently the world’s fastest growing independent supplier of gaming systems and jackpots. Our state-of-the-art systems are developed using the latest technology, resulting in the unique ability to operate without a permanent server connection, in so doing greatly simplifying system installation and implementation, and ensuring gaming operators total management control over their entire estate. At present our modular, flexible and cost-effective system and jackpot solutions operate across 70 different countries, and on in excess of 80,000 gaming devices, boasting some of the most powerful functionality in the world. In addition to our Head Quarters in Belgium, we also operate offices in Austria, Malta, Peru, Mexico, Colombia, Uruguay, Paraguay, and South Africa.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anaxionlinermg.jpeg
Anaxi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dr-gaming-technology.jpeg
DR Gaming Technology™
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anaxi
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DR Gaming Technology™
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anaxi in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DR Gaming Technology™ in 2025.

Incident History — Anaxi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anaxi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DR Gaming Technology™ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DR Gaming Technology™ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anaxionlinermg.jpeg
Anaxi
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dr-gaming-technology.jpeg
DR Gaming Technology™
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DR Gaming Technology™ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anaxi company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DR Gaming Technology™ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anaxi company.

In the current year, DR Gaming Technology™ company and Anaxi company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DR Gaming Technology™ company nor Anaxi company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DR Gaming Technology™ company nor Anaxi company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DR Gaming Technology™ company nor Anaxi company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anaxi company nor DR Gaming Technology™ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anaxi nor DR Gaming Technology™ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Anaxi company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to DR Gaming Technology™ company.

DR Gaming Technology™ company employs more people globally than Anaxi company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Anaxi nor DR Gaming Technology™ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anaxi nor DR Gaming Technology™ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anaxi nor DR Gaming Technology™ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anaxi nor DR Gaming Technology™ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anaxi nor DR Gaming Technology™ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anaxi nor DR Gaming Technology™ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H