Comparison Overview

Anavo

VS

Pataskala Oaks Care Center

Anavo

15-17 The Crescent, Leatherhead, KT22 8DY, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

Anavo is a care home operator and developer with a Management Team benefitting from over 50 years experience in the sector. We are expanding our operational platform and cover insolvency / turnaround scenarios, portfolio management and value enhancement strategies. We have a proven track record of delivering results through excellent governance and understanding the key drivers in care. We are also actively developing a pipeline of new build care homes to grow our operational platform and are building on our international design experience and connections to create innovative best in class developments that challenge the status quo in the market.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pataskala Oaks Care Center

144 E Broad St, Pataskala, OH, 43062, US
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 750 and 799

We provide care to residents both on a short-term or long-term basis. We can help individuals strengthen and recover after surgery or illness before they go home or provide a home like family atmosphere for residents who need long-term care. Most insurances are accepted including Medicare and Medicaid. Valued partners on our care giving team include LPN, RN, STNA, environmental services, dietary, and office workers.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anavo-capital.jpeg
Anavo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pataskala-oaks-care-center.jpeg
Pataskala Oaks Care Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anavo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pataskala Oaks Care Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anavo in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pataskala Oaks Care Center in 2025.

Incident History — Anavo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anavo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pataskala Oaks Care Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pataskala Oaks Care Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anavo-capital.jpeg
Anavo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pataskala-oaks-care-center.jpeg
Pataskala Oaks Care Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pataskala Oaks Care Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anavo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pataskala Oaks Care Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anavo company.

In the current year, Pataskala Oaks Care Center company and Anavo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pataskala Oaks Care Center company nor Anavo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pataskala Oaks Care Center company nor Anavo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pataskala Oaks Care Center company nor Anavo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anavo company nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anavo nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Anavo company nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Anavo company employs more people globally than Pataskala Oaks Care Center company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Anavo nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anavo nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anavo nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anavo nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anavo nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anavo nor Pataskala Oaks Care Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N