Comparison Overview

Anavo

VS

DiningRD

Anavo

15-17 The Crescent, Leatherhead, KT22 8DY, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

Anavo is a care home operator and developer with a Management Team benefitting from over 50 years experience in the sector. We are expanding our operational platform and cover insolvency / turnaround scenarios, portfolio management and value enhancement strategies. We have a proven track record of delivering results through excellent governance and understanding the key drivers in care. We are also actively developing a pipeline of new build care homes to grow our operational platform and are building on our international design experience and connections to create innovative best in class developments that challenge the status quo in the market.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 98
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DiningRD

1650 Des Peres Rd, St Louis, 63131, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

DiningRD: Menu Technology, Consulting Dietitians, Education DiningRD, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, delivers expert nutrition services and innovative technology to senior living communities nationwide. We provide menu technology solutions, dietitian consulting services, and education programs to support compliance and enhance dining services. With a passion for nurturing joy through food, our team of Registered Dietitians, Certified Dietary Managers, and foodservice professionals helps communities improve dining experiences, manage resident nutritional care, and ensure regulatory compliance. Since 1994, DiningRD (formerly Health Technologies) has supported over 8,500 healthcare communities across 42 states with industry-leading food and nutrition solutions.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 234
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anavo-capital.jpeg
Anavo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diningrd.jpeg
DiningRD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anavo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DiningRD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anavo in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DiningRD in 2025.

Incident History — Anavo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anavo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DiningRD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DiningRD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anavo-capital.jpeg
Anavo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diningrd.jpeg
DiningRD
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DiningRD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anavo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DiningRD company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Anavo company.

In the current year, DiningRD company and Anavo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DiningRD company nor Anavo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DiningRD company nor Anavo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DiningRD company nor Anavo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Anavo company nor DiningRD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anavo nor DiningRD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Anavo company nor DiningRD company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DiningRD company employs more people globally than Anavo company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Anavo nor DiningRD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anavo nor DiningRD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anavo nor DiningRD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anavo nor DiningRD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anavo nor DiningRD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anavo nor DiningRD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N