Comparison Overview

Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation

VS

DataHaven

Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation

12 Prospekt Akademika Sakharova, Moscow, RU, 107078
Last Update: 2025-11-25
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://ac.gov.ru/en/

Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation is a Moscow-based think-tank providing real-time information and analytical support to the Government, dealing with independent analysis and forecast studies of the social and economic situation in Russia and the world, giving recommendations and proposals on priority issues of policies and reforms to the senior decision-makers. An essential part of Analytical Center’s activities is international expert networking which serves to attracting high-profile experts to independent policy-relevant research, analysis and discussion, and providing time-sensitive expert opinion on actual issues.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

DataHaven

1146 Chapel St, 202, New Haven, Connecticut, US, 06511
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ctdatahaven.org/

30 Years of Public Service: At DataHaven, our mission is to improve quality of life by collecting, interpreting and sharing public data for effective decision-making. We have served Greater New Haven and Connecticut as a nonprofit organization since 1992, working with many partners to develop reports, tools, and technical assistance programs that make information more useful to local communities. DataHaven is a partner of the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership, a collaborative national effort by the Urban Institute in Washington, DC and approximately 40 local partners to further the development and use of neighborhood information systems in local policymaking and community building. We are also involved in many initiatives to further the usability of high-quality data at a local and statewide level.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/analytical-center-for-the-government-of-the-russian-federation.jpeg
Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datahaven.jpeg
DataHaven
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DataHaven
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DataHaven in 2025.

Incident History — Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DataHaven (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DataHaven cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/analytical-center-for-the-government-of-the-russian-federation.jpeg
Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/datahaven.jpeg
DataHaven
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to DataHaven company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, DataHaven company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company.

In the current year, DataHaven company and Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DataHaven company nor Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DataHaven company nor Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DataHaven company nor Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company nor DataHaven company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation nor DataHaven holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company nor DataHaven company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation company employs more people globally than DataHaven company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation nor DataHaven holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation nor DataHaven holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation nor DataHaven holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation nor DataHaven holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation nor DataHaven holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation nor DataHaven holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References