Comparison Overview

Analysis Legal LLP

VS

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission

Analysis Legal LLP

Davenport House, Bramhall, SK7 1BA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We are a specialist employment law firm based in Bramhall, Cheshire. We have taken our years of experience working at major national and international law firms and translated this into a niche employment practice working with both employers and individuals. We provide practical, commercial and economical advice on all aspects of employment law. We have particular expertise in advising employers and employees in relation to settlement agreements in order to achieve a satisfactory termination of the employment relationship on the best possible terms. As well as the two founding partners the team also comprises a further 9 experienced employment solicitors.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission

Capital Building, Edinburgh, EH2 2AF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-29

The Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (SLCC) is an independent statutory body providing a single point of contact for all complaints against lawyers operating in Scotland. We manage complaints that relate to the service provided by lawyers – offering resolution and providing redress where appropriate We refer complaints about the personal conduct of lawyers to the ‘relevant professional organisation’ (e.g. the Law Society of Scotland, the Faculty of Advocates). We give advice on complaints to all parties and issue guidance and encourage best practice in complaint handling and issues that lead to complaints. We monitor practice and publish trend reports – to help ensure the sector learns from complaints made. See our Social Media principles here - https://www.scottishlegalcomplaints.org.uk/contact-us/our-social-media-principles/

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

Compliance Summary
Analysis Legal LLP
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scottish Legal Complaints Commission
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Analysis Legal LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scottish Legal Complaints Commission in 2025.

Incident History — Analysis Legal LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Analysis Legal LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scottish Legal Complaints Commission (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/analysis-legal-llp.jpeg
Analysis Legal LLP
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scottish-legal-complaints-commission.jpeg
Scottish Legal Complaints Commission
Incidents

FAQ

Both Analysis Legal LLP company and Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Analysis Legal LLP company.

In the current year, Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company and Analysis Legal LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company nor Analysis Legal LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company nor Analysis Legal LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company nor Analysis Legal LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP company nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP company nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scottish Legal Complaints Commission company employs more people globally than Analysis Legal LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Analysis Legal LLP nor Scottish Legal Complaints Commission holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X