Comparison Overview

AMRIC

VS

COBALT Legal

AMRIC

6444 Fly Road, East Syracuse, 13057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

AMRIC Assocates Ltd. operates within a network of more than 800 former FBI agents located throughout the United States, Canada and much of the world. They are supported by extensive contacts in law enforcement, legal, and business communities. Drawing on the experience of investigators with more than 1,000 years of investigative, security, and case management experience, AMRIC Associates offers thorough, professional, and confidential services.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

COBALT Legal

Tallinn, Riga, Vilnius, OO
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For more than 35 years, we have helped businesses navigate both the everyday and the exceptional - from routine legal matters to landmark deals and complex disputes. Our clients know us for being steady, insightful, and fully committed to their goals. Today, COBALT brings together over 280 professionals across the Baltics, working as one alliance of top-tier law firms. What sets us apart is not just our legal expertise, but the way we collaborate, listen, and build strategies that make a difference. We are proud to stand alongside leading international companies, regional champions, financial institutions, governments, and the region’s most ambitious start-ups. At COBALT, we believe bold results come from trusted partnerships - and that’s what drives us every day. We offer leading-edge solutions in key industry sectors: Consumer Products, Trade & Distribution, Real Estate & Construction, Pharmaceuticals & Healthcare, Energy & Utilities, Communications, Media & Technologies, Financial Services, Transport & Logistics. Our accolades speak volumes about our commitment to excellence: - Baltic Law Firm of the Year 2025 by Benchmark Litigation Europe - Baltic Law Firm of the Year 2024 by Chambers Europe - Baltic States Tax Firm of the Year 2023 by ITR EMEA Tax Awards - Baltics Firm of the Year 2023 by Women in Business Law EMEA Awards - Tier 1 law firm in 25 practice areas in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania 2024, consistently top ranked over 15 years by Legal 500 - No. 1 law firm in the Baltics according to the Prospera Law Firm Review 2024 - Regularly featured among top legal advisors in Mergermarket, Bloomberg and Refinitiv deal tables At COBALT it is never ‘yet another case’: what matters to you matters to us! Whether it is a small part of the project or a ground-breaking case, it has our full attention. Because we know - every single detail is a big deal when your business is at stake.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 274
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amric.jpeg
AMRIC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AMRIC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
COBALT Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AMRIC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COBALT Legal in 2025.

Incident History — AMRIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMRIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — COBALT Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COBALT Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amric.jpeg
AMRIC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cobalt-legal.jpeg
COBALT Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AMRIC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to COBALT Legal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, COBALT Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AMRIC company.

In the current year, COBALT Legal company and AMRIC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither COBALT Legal company nor AMRIC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither COBALT Legal company nor AMRIC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither COBALT Legal company nor AMRIC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AMRIC company nor COBALT Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AMRIC nor COBALT Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AMRIC company nor COBALT Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

COBALT Legal company employs more people globally than AMRIC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither AMRIC nor COBALT Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AMRIC nor COBALT Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AMRIC nor COBALT Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AMRIC nor COBALT Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AMRIC nor COBALT Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AMRIC nor COBALT Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X