Comparison Overview

AMP Los Angeles

VS

Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors

AMP Los Angeles

undefined, Los Angeles, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

AMP Los Angeles is an arts-based mentor program focusing on exposing at-risk youth to vocations in the arts and amplifying career opportunities for each. We serve L.A. through film-making programs where youth create short movies in order to develop character & learn skills that will better their lives and community.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors

None, None, San Francisco, California, US, 94115
Last Update: 2025-12-09

FJA strives to inspire a jazz renaissance to transform the "Old Fillmore Jazz Preservation District" into the new "Fillmore Jazz District" through tourism to restore the disenfranchised Fillmore community by spreading jazz throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. A San Francisco Human Right's Commission Dream Keeper Organization, FJA's mission is to create excitement and rejuvenate jazz through jazz history workshops, jam sessions, & jazz production workshops, followed by jazz productions to showcase the jazz projects from the workshops presented by local jazz legends featuring local artists.

NAICS: 7111
NAICS Definition: Performing Arts Companies
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amp-los-angeles.jpeg
AMP Los Angeles
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fillmore-jazz-ambassadors.jpeg
Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AMP Los Angeles
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AMP Los Angeles in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors in 2025.

Incident History — AMP Los Angeles (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMP Los Angeles cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amp-los-angeles.jpeg
AMP Los Angeles
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fillmore-jazz-ambassadors.jpeg
Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AMP Los Angeles company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AMP Los Angeles company.

In the current year, Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company and AMP Los Angeles company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company nor AMP Los Angeles company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company nor AMP Los Angeles company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company nor AMP Los Angeles company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AMP Los Angeles company nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AMP Los Angeles nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AMP Los Angeles company nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both AMP Los Angeles company and Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither AMP Los Angeles nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AMP Los Angeles nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AMP Los Angeles nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AMP Los Angeles nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AMP Los Angeles nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AMP Los Angeles nor Fillmore Jazz Ambassadors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N