Comparison Overview

AMORELIE

VS

Hollywood Traders

AMORELIE

Rosenthaler Straße 40, Berlin, 10178, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amorelie.com

AMORELIE (www.amorelie.com) is a fashionable Onlineshop for your S*x life! It covers everything from kinky dessous, to love toys and games to have a fabulous, fun, interesting life! ---- AMORELIE (www.amorelie.de) ist der bekannteste Onlineshop für sinnliche Lifestyleprodukte und richtet sich an trendbewusste Singles und Paare. Denn er bietet nicht nur ein spezialisiertes Angebot für die intimen Liebesangelegenheiten, sondern auch ein breites Angebot, um sich rundum fabelhaft zu fühlen und auszusehen. ---- Impressum: https://www.amorelie.de/impressum/

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Hollywood Traders

367 S Rohlwing Rd, Addison, 60101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-26
Between 750 and 799
www.hollywoodtradersllc.com

Hollywoodtradersllc.com is a supermarket which aims at saving users from the hassle of going out and buying their necessities. We are delivering throughout the U.S.A.The online shopping of your needs is a blessing to get the required products over a few clicks. We at Hollywood traders store provides our customers with the best deals to get value addition on the purchase of products available online as a bundle offer. If you are in the mood to mingle with friends but you got a list of your necessities in your pocket, just visit Hollywood Traders store and order your desired product to get it delivered right at your doorstep while you get yourself entertained with friends. Specializing in Amazon, Walmart, Etsy, and Printify.

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amorelie.jpeg
AMORELIE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollywood-traders.jpeg
Hollywood Traders
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AMORELIE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hollywood Traders
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AMORELIE in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hollywood Traders in 2025.

Incident History — AMORELIE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMORELIE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hollywood Traders (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hollywood Traders cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amorelie.jpeg
AMORELIE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hollywood-traders.jpeg
Hollywood Traders
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both AMORELIE company and Hollywood Traders company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Hollywood Traders company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AMORELIE company.

In the current year, Hollywood Traders company and AMORELIE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hollywood Traders company nor AMORELIE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hollywood Traders company nor AMORELIE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hollywood Traders company nor AMORELIE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AMORELIE company nor Hollywood Traders company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AMORELIE nor Hollywood Traders holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AMORELIE company nor Hollywood Traders company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AMORELIE company employs more people globally than Hollywood Traders company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither AMORELIE nor Hollywood Traders holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor Hollywood Traders holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor Hollywood Traders holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor Hollywood Traders holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor Hollywood Traders holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor Hollywood Traders holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References