Comparison Overview

AMORELIE

VS

GiftYa

AMORELIE

Rosenthaler Straße 40, Berlin, 10178, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amorelie.com

AMORELIE (www.amorelie.com) is a fashionable Onlineshop for your S*x life! It covers everything from kinky dessous, to love toys and games to have a fabulous, fun, interesting life! ---- AMORELIE (www.amorelie.de) ist der bekannteste Onlineshop für sinnliche Lifestyleprodukte und richtet sich an trendbewusste Singles und Paare. Denn er bietet nicht nur ein spezialisiertes Angebot für die intimen Liebesangelegenheiten, sondern auch ein breites Angebot, um sich rundum fabelhaft zu fühlen und auszusehen. ---- Impressum: https://www.amorelie.de/impressum/

NAICS: 4541
NAICS Definition: Electronic Shopping and Mail-Order Houses
Employees: 75
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

GiftYa

495 Mansfield Ave, Pittsburgh, PA - Pennsylvania, 15205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.giftya.com

Every day, consumers are looking for ways to make their lives easier. In fact, we now live in a world where we expect to find an easier way to do things. Gift cards have not evolved in over 24 years. In fact, the company who invented gift cards no longer exists. GiftYa is a unique gift to evolve the gift card. Easy, personalized and meaningful… a GiftYa is sent within seconds, can’t be lost and doesn’t lose value! Gift cards are cumbersome, easily lost and stolen, and cannot be personalized. Has your gift card evolved? Join the #GiftYa movement.

NAICS: 454
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amorelie.jpeg
AMORELIE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giftya.jpeg
GiftYa
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AMORELIE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GiftYa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AMORELIE in 2025.

Incidents vs Online and Mail Order Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GiftYa in 2025.

Incident History — AMORELIE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMORELIE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GiftYa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GiftYa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amorelie.jpeg
AMORELIE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/giftya.jpeg
GiftYa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AMORELIE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GiftYa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GiftYa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AMORELIE company.

In the current year, GiftYa company and AMORELIE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GiftYa company nor AMORELIE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GiftYa company nor AMORELIE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GiftYa company nor AMORELIE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AMORELIE company nor GiftYa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AMORELIE nor GiftYa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AMORELIE company nor GiftYa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AMORELIE company employs more people globally than GiftYa company, reflecting its scale as a Online and Mail Order Retail.

Neither AMORELIE nor GiftYa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor GiftYa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor GiftYa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor GiftYa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor GiftYa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AMORELIE nor GiftYa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. Affected is an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPUserSetting. Performing manipulation of the argument delno results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda WH450 1.0.0.18. This impacts an unknown function of the file /goform/PPTPServer. Such manipulation of the argument ip1 leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 7.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in omec-project UPF up to 2.1.3-dev. This affects the function handleSessionEstablishmentRequest of the file /pfcpiface/pfcpiface/messages_session.go of the component PFCP Session Establishment Request Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in floooh sokol up to 16cbcc864012898793cd2bc57f802499a264ea40. The impacted element is the function _sg_pipeline_desc_defaults in the library sokol_gfx.h. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The patch is identified as 5d11344150973f15e16d3ec4ee7550a73fb995e0. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-28
Updated
Date
2025-12-28
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References