Comparison Overview

Amidon Graphics

VS

InkBox Printing 2.0

Amidon Graphics

1966 Benson Ave, St Paul, 55116, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

For over 65 years Amidon Graphics has provided high quality web printing at competitive prices. A family-owned web printer with a national reputation, our experienced team is dedicated to customer partnerships. We’re innovative, resourceful and budget-conscious . . . with a small family feel. Featuring efficient web printing with in-line finishing, we can fold, perf, glue, die or laser cut, apply fragrance, affix cards and ink jet variable data in a single press pass. Nine options. One-pass web printing with in-line finishing. By eliminating separate bindery and mailing processes, Amidon will save you time, money and hassle on your inserts, direct mail and custom photo pocket flyers and envelopes. With our strong presence and relationships in the food industry, we’ve grown beyond placemats and tray liners. Today we offer 8 web presses, most with in-line finishing capabilities to create effective print marketing. amidongraphics.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

InkBox Printing 2.0

12629 Haynes Rd, Houston, Texas, 77066, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

The complete source for all of your graphic and printing needs. Since its inception in 2010, Inkbox Printing had two goals: to cement ourselves in the printing industry by building lasting and growing relationships with our clients while delivering top notch customer service and production. With exceptional, experienced staff members, InkBox is focused on providing a wide range of the latest printing technologies in large and small format digital printing, with a focus on exceeding expectations. Under new innovative ownership since May 2017, Inkbox continues to solidify its foundation through state of the art technology and a commitment to excellence. In addition to print, our graphic designers set us apart by bringing your ideas to life and lifting your brand to new heights. We approach your projects from every angle, and then utilize our many printing and finishing solutions to offer you the greatest result while maintaining cost effectiveness. Through decade long partnerships with some of Houston's most recognizable companies and a client base spanning across the United States, Inkbox 2.0 shows no signs of slowing down. We pride ourselves on being a complete source for all of your graphics and printing needs. Being a premier partner within the Houston Strong community remains our sole focus through knowledge, technology and execution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amidon-graphics.jpeg
Amidon Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inkbox-printing.jpeg
InkBox Printing 2.0
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amidon Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
InkBox Printing 2.0
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amidon Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InkBox Printing 2.0 in 2025.

Incident History — Amidon Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amidon Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — InkBox Printing 2.0 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InkBox Printing 2.0 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amidon-graphics.jpeg
Amidon Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inkbox-printing.jpeg
InkBox Printing 2.0
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amidon Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to InkBox Printing 2.0 company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, InkBox Printing 2.0 company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Amidon Graphics company.

In the current year, InkBox Printing 2.0 company and Amidon Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 company nor Amidon Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 company nor Amidon Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither InkBox Printing 2.0 company nor Amidon Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Amidon Graphics company nor InkBox Printing 2.0 company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Amidon Graphics nor InkBox Printing 2.0 holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Amidon Graphics company nor InkBox Printing 2.0 company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Amidon Graphics company employs more people globally than InkBox Printing 2.0 company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Amidon Graphics nor InkBox Printing 2.0 holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amidon Graphics nor InkBox Printing 2.0 holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amidon Graphics nor InkBox Printing 2.0 holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amidon Graphics nor InkBox Printing 2.0 holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amidon Graphics nor InkBox Printing 2.0 holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amidon Graphics nor InkBox Printing 2.0 holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L