Comparison Overview

Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago

VS

BJ's Bingo

Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago

777 Ameristar Blvd, East Chicago, Indiana, 46312, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago has one of the largest selections of games in northwest Indiana, with more than 1,700 of the newest and most popular slots and video poker games and 58 table games, 12 poker tables on four spacious playing levels. The property is known for its high-quality guest service, superior dining and luxurious hotel rooms, which won a certificate of excellence from Trip Advisor in 2013.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 125
Subsidiaries: 41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

BJ's Bingo

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

BJs Bingo is a family run group of purpose built modern Bingo clubs, consider by many to be one of the leading independent operators. We are highly focused on our customer service & experience, opening our first club in Reading in 2002, followed by Leigh in 2003 & then Kitt's Green in 2007. We are market leaders in our areas and pride ourselves on our innovative & technology driven approach to the industry. We are often a testing house for major suppliers for latest equipment and ideas. We have also developed our own sister company Shipley Creative which provides digital media & print to the whole gaming industry and beyond!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ameristar-casino-east-chicago-llc.jpeg
Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bjs-bingo.jpeg
BJ's Bingo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BJ's Bingo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BJ's Bingo in 2025.

Incident History — Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BJ's Bingo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BJ's Bingo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ameristar-casino-east-chicago-llc.jpeg
Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bjs-bingo.jpeg
BJ's Bingo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company and BJ's Bingo company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, BJ's Bingo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company.

In the current year, BJ's Bingo company and Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BJ's Bingo company nor Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BJ's Bingo company nor Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BJ's Bingo company nor Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company nor BJ's Bingo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago nor BJ's Bingo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BJ's Bingo company.

Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago company employs more people globally than BJ's Bingo company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago nor BJ's Bingo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago nor BJ's Bingo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago nor BJ's Bingo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago nor BJ's Bingo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago nor BJ's Bingo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ameristar Casino Hotel East Chicago nor BJ's Bingo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H