Comparison Overview

americanas s.a.

VS

Premium Restaurant Brands

americanas s.a.

Rua Coelho e Castro 60, None, Rio de Janeiro, None, BR, 20081-060
Last Update: 2025-11-21

We are Americanas, one of the largest retailers in the country, with over 95 years of history. Our brand, loved by Brazilians, aims to simplify and improve the lives of families. The integration of more than 1,600 stores across all states, along with an e-commerce platform that complements the physical experience, allows us to implement an efficient multichannel sales strategy focused on cash generation and profitability. Based on our operations and mission, we value our people and are committed to making a positive impact on the lives of individuals, communities, and stakeholders, with a focus on reducing inequalities, generating jobs, promoting professional development, and fostering diversity. Here at Americanas, we combine unique assets: people united in the pursuit of operational excellence, millions of customers visiting our stores, website, and app every day, along with a fully integrated ecosystem aimed at providing the best shopping experience for our consumers.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 28,799
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Premium Restaurant Brands

Paseo de los Tamarindos 400 A Bosques de las Lomas piso 1 Cuajimalpa de Morelos, Ciudad de México, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Premium Restaurant Brands cuenta con la marca Kentucky Fried Chicken en México con presencia a nivel nacional, teniendo más de 450 restaurantes tanto propios como franquicias, dentro de los cuales laboran más de 10,000 colaboradores que trabajan diariamente para brindar el mejor servicio y seguir siendo la marca favorita de México y el Mejor Lugar para Trabajar. ¡Tú eres el ingrediente secreto que estamos buscando! Intégrate a nuestro equipo de trabajo En Premium creemos firmemente en las habilidades de la gente y en ayudar a desarrollar su talento. Somos un equipo que se entrega diariamente con coraje y compromiso. Trabajamos día con día para conservar un agradable ambiente, ofrecemos la oportunidad de desarrollar tu talento, así como explotar tus habilidades a través de tu carrera, logrando así alcanzar resultados extraordinarios y teniendo un impacto verdadero en la organización, con un crecimiento y desarrollo continuo para nuestro talento interno.

NAICS: 452
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/americanas-sa.jpeg
americanas s.a.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/premium-restaurants-brands.jpeg
Premium Restaurant Brands
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
americanas s.a.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Premium Restaurant Brands
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for americanas s.a. in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Premium Restaurant Brands in 2025.

Incident History — americanas s.a. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

americanas s.a. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Premium Restaurant Brands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Premium Restaurant Brands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/americanas-sa.jpeg
americanas s.a.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/premium-restaurants-brands.jpeg
Premium Restaurant Brands
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

americanas s.a. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Premium Restaurant Brands company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Premium Restaurant Brands company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to americanas s.a. company.

In the current year, Premium Restaurant Brands company and americanas s.a. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Premium Restaurant Brands company nor americanas s.a. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Premium Restaurant Brands company nor americanas s.a. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Premium Restaurant Brands company nor americanas s.a. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither americanas s.a. company nor Premium Restaurant Brands company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither americanas s.a. nor Premium Restaurant Brands holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither americanas s.a. company nor Premium Restaurant Brands company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

americanas s.a. company employs more people globally than Premium Restaurant Brands company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither americanas s.a. nor Premium Restaurant Brands holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither americanas s.a. nor Premium Restaurant Brands holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither americanas s.a. nor Premium Restaurant Brands holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither americanas s.a. nor Premium Restaurant Brands holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither americanas s.a. nor Premium Restaurant Brands holds HIPAA certification.

Neither americanas s.a. nor Premium Restaurant Brands holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H