Comparison Overview

American Textile History Museum

VS

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

American Textile History Museum

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

It is with a heavy heart that we inform you that due to a significant financial deficit, the American Textile History Museum has closed our doors to the public. Over the next year, we will seek to find new homes for our collection. We are gratefully accepting donations to help preserve and protect these priceless artifacts. --- An affiliate of the Smithsonian Institution, the American Textile History Museum in Lowell, MA, tells America’s story through the art, history, and science of textiles. ATHM holds the world’s largest and most important collections of tools, spinning wheels, hand looms, and early production machines, as well as more than five million pieces of textile prints, fabric samples, rolled textiles coverlets, and costumes. At the American Textile History Museum, we have dedicated more than 50 years to preserving the past and shaping the future. Our collections, education programs, research library, and on-line catalogue provide a fascinating in-depth look at the world through the art, history, and science of textiles.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo

1875 Noble Ave, Bridgeport, 06610, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo is the state's only zoo - providing wild experiences for more than 100 years. Visit more than 350 species of primarily North and South American animals, including Amur tiger and leopards, Brazilian ocelot, Mexican wolves, and golden Lion tamarins. Highlights include our new Andean bear habitat, spider monkey habitat, Natt Family Red Panda Habitat, South American rainforest with free-flight aviary, the prairie dog exhibit with "pop-up"​ viewing areas, the New England Farmyard with goats, cows, pigs, and other barnyard favorites, plus the hoofstock trail featuring bison, deer, and more.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-textile-history-museum.jpeg
American Textile History Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Textile History Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Textile History Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — American Textile History Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Textile History Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-textile-history-museum.jpeg
American Textile History Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut's-beardsley-zoo.jpeg
Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Textile History Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Textile History Museum company.

In the current year, Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company and American Textile History Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor American Textile History Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor American Textile History Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company nor American Textile History Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Textile History Museum company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Textile History Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Textile History Museum company nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo company employs more people globally than American Textile History Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither American Textile History Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Textile History Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Textile History Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Textile History Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Textile History Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Textile History Museum nor Connecticut's Beardsley Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H