Comparison Overview

American Reprographics Corporation (ARC)

VS

Taylor Made Labels

American Reprographics Corporation (ARC)

None, None, Atlanta, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arcinatlanta.com

Founded in 1978, ARC’s mission is to do what we say we are going to do, in a timely fashion, with consideration of every detail to make sure each order is prioritized and done correctly. A woman owned and family operated company, ARC prides itself on providing exceptional personalized customer service, while offering a wide variety of products and services at the highest quality to meet our customer's needs. When you work with us, you are working with US! We have the knowledge and commitment to guide you through all of your printing needs ensuring you get exactly what you need. We are more than just a printer! If you print with it, print on it, or simply need it printed, it’s time to partner with ARC!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Taylor Made Labels

17252 Pilkington Road, Lake Oswego, Oregon, 97035, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.taylormadelabels.com

With over 35 years in business, Taylor Made Labels has long been a leader of innovation in the world of pressure sensitive label printing. Today, we are happy to include digital printing, 9 color flexo printing, specialty printing including foil stamping and embossing, environmentally friendly printing, and wine label printing among the printing techniques that help us produce the most eye-catching labels for our clients. We also can help solve your labeling equipment needs, with experts on staff and in the field to help with your application and variable printing needs. No matter how simple or how complicated, Taylor Made Labels has the "can do"​ attitude and experience you’re looking for.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-reprographics-corporation.jpeg
American Reprographics Corporation (ARC)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-made-labels.jpeg
Taylor Made Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Reprographics Corporation (ARC)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Taylor Made Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Taylor Made Labels in 2025.

Incident History — American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Taylor Made Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Taylor Made Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-reprographics-corporation.jpeg
American Reprographics Corporation (ARC)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/taylor-made-labels.jpeg
Taylor Made Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company and Taylor Made Labels company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Taylor Made Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company.

In the current year, Taylor Made Labels company and American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Taylor Made Labels company nor American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Taylor Made Labels company nor American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Taylor Made Labels company nor American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company nor Taylor Made Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) nor Taylor Made Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company nor Taylor Made Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) company employs more people globally than Taylor Made Labels company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) nor Taylor Made Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) nor Taylor Made Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) nor Taylor Made Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) nor Taylor Made Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) nor Taylor Made Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Reprographics Corporation (ARC) nor Taylor Made Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References