Comparison Overview

American Patient Rights Association

VS

Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health

American Patient Rights Association

undefined, Mount Dora, FL, 32757, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

American Patient Rights Association (APRA) is a nonprofit consumer organization, advocating for safety, fairness and transparency in healthcare. Based in Florida, APRA is dedicated to empowering, informing and educating health-care consumers, and advocating and agitating for improved health-care safety, costs, accountability, transparency and patient rights. Visit AmericanPatient.org for further information.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health

Ford Building, 106, State College, Pennsylvania, US, 16803
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health (PORH) partners with federal and state governments and Penn State University to enhance rural health in Pennsylvania. Established in 1991 and funded by the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, PORH provides coordination, technical assistance, and healthcare provider recruitment. Specializing in rural health, agricultural safety, oral health, and community development, PORH ensures access to high-quality, affordable healthcare for rural Pennsylvanians. Our mission is to improve rural health and be recognized as a premier rural health organization in Pennsylvania and one of the most effective in the nation.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-patient-rights-association.jpeg
American Patient Rights Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pennsylvania-office-of-rural-health.jpeg
Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Patient Rights Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Patient Rights Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health in 2025.

Incident History — American Patient Rights Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Patient Rights Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-patient-rights-association.jpeg
American Patient Rights Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pennsylvania-office-of-rural-health.jpeg
Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Patient Rights Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Patient Rights Association company.

In the current year, Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company and American Patient Rights Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company nor American Patient Rights Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company nor American Patient Rights Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company nor American Patient Rights Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Patient Rights Association company nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Patient Rights Association nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Patient Rights Association company nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health company employs more people globally than American Patient Rights Association company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither American Patient Rights Association nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Patient Rights Association nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Patient Rights Association nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Patient Rights Association nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Patient Rights Association nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Patient Rights Association nor Pennsylvania Office of Rural Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H