Comparison Overview

American Museum of Natural History

VS

North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores

American Museum of Natural History

Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY, US, 10024
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The American Museum of Natural History is one of the world's preeminent scientific and cultural institutions. Since its founding in 1869, the Museum has advanced its global mission to discover, interpret and disseminate information about human cultures, the natural world and the universe through a wide-ranging program of scientific research, education and exhibition. The Museum is renowned for its exhibitions and scientific collections, which serve as a field guide to the entire planet and present a panorama of the world's cultures.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 1,522
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores

1 Roosevelt Blvd., Pine Knoll Shores, North Carolina, 28512, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21

On September 17, 1976, the state opened three North Carolina Marine Resources Centers – one at Fort Fisher, one at Pine Knoll Shores, and one on Roanoke Island. The centers were launched as research and education facilities, which also offered small exhibits that were open to the public. The centers quickly became popular, and in 1986, they were renamed the North Carolina Aquarium at Fort Fisher, the North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores, and the North Carolina Aquarium on Roanoke Island. That same year, a group of dedicated citizens incorporated a membership-based support group, the North Carolina Aquarium Society. The Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores is situated in the Theodore Roosevelt Natural Area, which is mostly maritime forest. Descendants of President Theodore Roosevelt donated 298 acres of maritime forest to the state in 1971. They stipulated the acreage be maintained as a nature preserve and used for nature and wildlife education and estuarine studies. The Aquarium's mission is to inspire the appreciation and conservation of North Carolina's aquatic environments and animals. Visit our website for more information and events and tickets www.ncaquariums.com/pine-knoll-shores

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
American Museum of Natural History
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-carolina-aquarium-at-pine-knoll-shores.jpeg
North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Museum of Natural History
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Museum of Natural History in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores in 2026.

Incident History — American Museum of Natural History (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Museum of Natural History cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-museum-of-natural-history.jpeg
American Museum of Natural History
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/north-carolina-aquarium-at-pine-knoll-shores.jpeg
North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Museum of Natural History company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Museum of Natural History company.

In the current year, North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company and American Museum of Natural History company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company nor American Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company nor American Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company nor American Museum of Natural History company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Museum of Natural History company nor North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Museum of Natural History nor North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

American Museum of Natural History company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company.

American Museum of Natural History company employs more people globally than North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither American Museum of Natural History nor North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Museum of Natural History nor North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Museum of Natural History nor North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Museum of Natural History nor North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Museum of Natural History nor North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Museum of Natural History nor North Carolina Aquarium at Pine Knoll Shores holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N