Comparison Overview

American Gaming Association

VS

ACME Player Services

American Gaming Association

799 9th St. NW, Washington, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

As the national trade group representing the U.S. casino industry, the American Gaming Association (AGA) fosters a policy and business environment where legal, regulated gaming thrives. The AGA’s diverse membership of commercial and tribal casino operators, sports betting and iGaming companies, gaming suppliers, and more lead the $261 billion industry and support 1.8 million jobs across the country.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 54
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ACME Player Services

10801 Walker Street, Cypress, CA, 90630, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

ACME Player provide superior third-party propositional player services to California Card Room Casinos. Our dedicated staff provides unparalleled customer care and brings professional experience to the table. Backed by our unrivaled leadership and experience in the gaming industry, we strive to increase our clients' business by sharing game-promotion strategies and delivering highly-trained bankers to increase game action.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-gaming-association.jpeg
American Gaming Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acme-player-services.jpeg
ACME Player Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Gaming Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ACME Player Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Gaming Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACME Player Services in 2025.

Incident History — American Gaming Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Gaming Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ACME Player Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACME Player Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-gaming-association.jpeg
American Gaming Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acme-player-services.jpeg
ACME Player Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ACME Player Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Gaming Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ACME Player Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Gaming Association company.

In the current year, ACME Player Services company and American Gaming Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ACME Player Services company nor American Gaming Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ACME Player Services company nor American Gaming Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ACME Player Services company nor American Gaming Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Gaming Association company nor ACME Player Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Gaming Association nor ACME Player Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Gaming Association company nor ACME Player Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Gaming Association company employs more people globally than ACME Player Services company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither American Gaming Association nor ACME Player Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Gaming Association nor ACME Player Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Gaming Association nor ACME Player Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Gaming Association nor ACME Player Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Gaming Association nor ACME Player Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Gaming Association nor ACME Player Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H