Comparison Overview

American Folk Art Museum

VS

Tampa Bay History Center

American Folk Art Museum

2 Lincoln Square, New York, NY, 10023, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Since 1961, the American Folk Art Museum has shaped the understanding of art by the self-taught through its exhibitions, publications, and educational programs. As a center of scholarship, it showcases the creativity of individuals whose singular talents have been refined through personal experience rather than formal artistic training. Its collection includes more than eight thousand works of art from four centuries and nearly every continent—from compelling portraits and dazzling quilts to powerful works by living artists in a variety of mediums.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tampa Bay History Center

801 Water Street, Tampa, FL, 33602, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Tampa Bay History Center takes you on a 12,000-year journey through the past, highlighting the people and stories of Florida's West Coast. With three floors of cutting-edge exhibits and theaters, the History Center offers a unique experience for visitors of all ages and provides a sense of place for long-time residents, newcomers and out-of-town guests.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-folk-art-museum.jpeg
American Folk Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tampa-bay-history-center.jpeg
Tampa Bay History Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Folk Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tampa Bay History Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Folk Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tampa Bay History Center in 2026.

Incident History — American Folk Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Folk Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tampa Bay History Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tampa Bay History Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-folk-art-museum.jpeg
American Folk Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tampa-bay-history-center.jpeg
Tampa Bay History Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Folk Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tampa Bay History Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tampa Bay History Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Folk Art Museum company.

In the current year, Tampa Bay History Center company and American Folk Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center company nor American Folk Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center company nor American Folk Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tampa Bay History Center company nor American Folk Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Folk Art Museum company nor Tampa Bay History Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Folk Art Museum nor Tampa Bay History Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Folk Art Museum company nor Tampa Bay History Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Folk Art Museum company employs more people globally than Tampa Bay History Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither American Folk Art Museum nor Tampa Bay History Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Folk Art Museum nor Tampa Bay History Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Folk Art Museum nor Tampa Bay History Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Folk Art Museum nor Tampa Bay History Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Folk Art Museum nor Tampa Bay History Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Folk Art Museum nor Tampa Bay History Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H