Comparison Overview

American Defense Systems, Inc.

VS

Addmore Engineering Ltd

American Defense Systems, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

A small business Defense Contractor based in Lillington, North Carolina. As a world leader in the design, fabrication, and installation of transparent and opaque armor, security doors, windows and curtain wall systems, American Defense Systems, Inc. transforms the Architect’s & Engineers designs into innovative, functional and aesthetically pleasing security applications for the physical security industry. We protect and serve those who defend, serve and protect us with an uncompromising commitment to safety and excellence in product design and installation. We bring value, integrity, and experience to our business partners and our customers. Our in-house design and engineering capabilities enable us to be more responsive to tight timeframes than anyone else in the industry. We have a strong record of delivering top-quality, tested and proven design solutions in just a fraction of the time taken by our competition. We are praised by our clients for our conceptual and intellectual capabilities in this ever-changing world. We have a proven ability to adapt our designs and products to respond to the protection requirements you may have.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Addmore Engineering Ltd

Unit 18, Stewartby, MK43 9NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Addmore is family run global supplier of CNC turned and milled components servicing components and sub-assemblies to a wide range of industries including Aerospace, Defence, Automotive, Hydraulic, Autosport, Fastener, Instrumentation, Oil and Medical Sectors. With several quality certifications, including ISO:9001, we can deliver directly into OEMs and SMEs with equal efficiency. We currently have 32 of the latest CNC machine tools. Our turning department consists of multi-axis sliding head machines (0.5-42mm diameter), Miyano fixed head turn-mill centers with 64mm bar capacity and larger Mori-Seiki fixed head turn-mill centers with 90mm bar capacity and 350mm chucking capacity. While our milling department consists of high precision vertical and horizontal machining centers. With the flexibility for high speed or heavy duty machining using 4 axis simultaneously. Addmore prides itself on partnering with key customers providing high quality products and services at a competitive price. As a family run business, we pride ourselves on our close relationships with all our customers, suppliers and staff. If you have any requirements for turned or milled components you can send your enquiries to [email protected]

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
American Defense Systems, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/addmore-engineering.jpeg
Addmore Engineering Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Defense Systems, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Addmore Engineering Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Defense Systems, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Addmore Engineering Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — American Defense Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Defense Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Addmore Engineering Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Addmore Engineering Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
American Defense Systems, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/addmore-engineering.jpeg
Addmore Engineering Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Defense Systems, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Addmore Engineering Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Addmore Engineering Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Defense Systems, Inc. company.

In the current year, Addmore Engineering Ltd company and American Defense Systems, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Addmore Engineering Ltd company nor American Defense Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Addmore Engineering Ltd company nor American Defense Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Addmore Engineering Ltd company nor American Defense Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. company nor Addmore Engineering Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. nor Addmore Engineering Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. company nor Addmore Engineering Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Defense Systems, Inc. company employs more people globally than Addmore Engineering Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. nor Addmore Engineering Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. nor Addmore Engineering Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. nor Addmore Engineering Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. nor Addmore Engineering Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. nor Addmore Engineering Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Defense Systems, Inc. nor Addmore Engineering Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H