Comparison Overview

American Bicycle Group

VS

Barska®

American Bicycle Group

4126 S Creek Rd, Chattanooga, Tennessee, US, 37406
Last Update: 2025-11-22

We are innovators, engineers, designers and reps but most of all, we are riders. Making bikes is a dream job, but it’s still a job. Luckily, we have some of the most talented workers in the business. And if there’s a group of people who love and obsess over cycling more than you, it’s us. Our love for the sport carries into our business and we love sharing that with you! At American Bicycle Group we design, build, and manufacture Litespeed Titanium Bicycles, Quintana Roo Tri Bikes, and Obed Bikes. litespeed.com quintanarootri.com obedbikes.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Barska®

855 Towne Center Drive, Pomona, California, 91767, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Barska, with corporate offices, warehouse and distribution in Pomona, CA is a worldwide sport optics & security solutions company with strong brand recognition in the sporting goods industry. Barska offers an extensive line of precision sport optics products, safes and accessories. If you require a price quote for our products or wish to establish a dealer or wholesale account, please reach out to us at [email protected]. Pomona CA, 91767 USA

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-bicycle-group.jpeg
American Bicycle Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barska-optics.jpeg
Barska®
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Bicycle Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Barska®
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Bicycle Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barska® in 2025.

Incident History — American Bicycle Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Bicycle Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Barska® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barska® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-bicycle-group.jpeg
American Bicycle Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barska-optics.jpeg
Barska®
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Bicycle Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barska® company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Barska® company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Bicycle Group company.

In the current year, Barska® company and American Bicycle Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Barska® company nor American Bicycle Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Barska® company nor American Bicycle Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Barska® company nor American Bicycle Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Bicycle Group company nor Barska® company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Bicycle Group nor Barska® holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Bicycle Group company nor Barska® company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

American Bicycle Group company employs more people globally than Barska® company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither American Bicycle Group nor Barska® holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Bicycle Group nor Barska® holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Bicycle Group nor Barska® holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Bicycle Group nor Barska® holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Bicycle Group nor Barska® holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Bicycle Group nor Barska® holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H