Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AMDAMD
VS
Marvell TechnologyMarvell Technology
AMD

AMD

2485 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, 95054, US

Last Update: 01/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amd.com
782/1000Fair

We care deeply about transforming lives with AMD technology to enrich our industry, our communities, and the world. Our mission is to build great products that accelerate next-generation computing experiences – the building blocks for the data center, artificial intelli...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:47,977
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, 95054, US

Last Update: 01/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.marvell.com
831/1000Good

We believe that infrastructure powers progress. That execution is as essential as innovation. That better collaboration builds better technology. At Marvell, We go all in with you. Focused and determined, we unite behind your goals as our own. We leverage our unrivaled...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:10,728
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AMD

AMD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AMD has 18.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marvell Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AMD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Marvell Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marvell Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AMD

AMD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMDLIN1783614518
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1781267811
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AMD1932419101425
Marvell Technology

Marvell Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AMD company and Marvell Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AMD and Marvell Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AMD and Marvell Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AMD or Marvell Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AMD or Marvell Technology ?
Between AMD and Marvell Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AMD and Marvell Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA