Comparison Overview

Ambient

VS

Dewyngaert Design

Ambient

Last Update: 2025-12-02

Ambient is an independent graphic design studio that provides contemporary graphic design, art direction and digital imaging services to a diverse base of clients - from small businesses, entrepreneurs and independent musicians to book publishers, corporate accounts and hapless family members. The Ambient mothership is operated by design dude, recording musician and allroundniceguy™, Scott Mosher, and maintains a focus on versatility, diversity, efficiency and a slew of other cool adjectives ending in the “ity” suffix. With an extensive portfolio, experience in a wide variety of design projects, and well-honed dedication to the craft of design that parallels that of the creator of the original Swiss Army Knife, Ambient offers cutting edge graphic design that makes heads turn, bodies move and puts people in the seats.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dewyngaert Design

304 Pennlyn Pl., Peachtree City, Georgia, 30269, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

It’s all about psychology. We strive to empathize with how a human interacts with the world. We approach a client’s needs by diving below the surface, analyzing and understanding how their consumers connect with their brand. This ultimately becomes the foundation for solving their needs, while simultaneously piquing the attention and fascination of each person who encounters—and engages—with the final experience. At Dewyngaert Design, we keep our finger on the pulse of current design trends. Research, exploration, and discovery are the first three steps to beginning any project. Our client’s projects are parallel to current design movements and challenge the barriers to what creativity can achieve.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambient.jpeg
Ambient
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eric-dewyngaert-design-inc-.jpeg
Dewyngaert Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ambient
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dewyngaert Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambient in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dewyngaert Design in 2025.

Incident History — Ambient (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambient cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dewyngaert Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dewyngaert Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambient.jpeg
Ambient
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eric-dewyngaert-design-inc-.jpeg
Dewyngaert Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ambient company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dewyngaert Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dewyngaert Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ambient company.

In the current year, Dewyngaert Design company and Ambient company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dewyngaert Design company nor Ambient company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dewyngaert Design company nor Ambient company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dewyngaert Design company nor Ambient company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ambient company nor Dewyngaert Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ambient nor Dewyngaert Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ambient company nor Dewyngaert Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Dewyngaert Design company employs more people globally than Ambient company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Ambient nor Dewyngaert Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ambient nor Dewyngaert Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ambient nor Dewyngaert Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ambient nor Dewyngaert Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ambient nor Dewyngaert Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ambient nor Dewyngaert Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X