Comparison Overview

Amberley Publishing

VS

Daylight Books

Amberley Publishing

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Amberley Publishing is the UK's most innovative publisher of history, specialist interest and local history books. Based in the Cotswolds, Amberley provides a fresh approach to local and specialist history publishing, with a 2014 publishing programme of over 500 new titles including 150 in the full-colour Through Time series plus new titles in our Classic Guide to, Bradshaw's Guides, History Tour, and some fantastic Tudor, English and World History titles. All titles available from www.amberleybooks.com www.amazon.co.uk/amberleypublishing

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Daylight Books

undefined, Bronx, NY, 10471, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Daylight is a non-profit organization dedicated to publishing art and photography books. By exploring the documentary mode along with the more conceptual concerns of fine-art, Daylight's uniquely collectible publications work to revitalize the relationship between art, photography, and the world-at-large.on Daylight also releases monthly multimedia podcasts and features a daily blog with exhibition and book reviews. Daylight has been featured by CNN, The New Yorker, The Los Angeles Times, The Associated Press, Utne Reader, American PHOTO, Source: The Photographic Review, Beautiful Decay, and PDN (Photo District News) and many more.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amberley-publishing.jpeg
Amberley Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daylight-magazine.jpeg
Daylight Books
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amberley Publishing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Daylight Books
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amberley Publishing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daylight Books in 2025.

Incident History — Amberley Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amberley Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Daylight Books (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daylight Books cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amberley-publishing.jpeg
Amberley Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/daylight-magazine.jpeg
Daylight Books
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Amberley Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Daylight Books company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Daylight Books company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Amberley Publishing company.

In the current year, Daylight Books company and Amberley Publishing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Daylight Books company nor Amberley Publishing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Daylight Books company nor Amberley Publishing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Daylight Books company nor Amberley Publishing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Amberley Publishing company nor Daylight Books company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Amberley Publishing nor Daylight Books holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Amberley Publishing company nor Daylight Books company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Amberley Publishing company employs more people globally than Daylight Books company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Amberley Publishing nor Daylight Books holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amberley Publishing nor Daylight Books holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amberley Publishing nor Daylight Books holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amberley Publishing nor Daylight Books holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amberley Publishing nor Daylight Books holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amberley Publishing nor Daylight Books holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.