Comparison Overview

Amberley Labels

VS

DWS Printing and Packaging

Amberley Labels

Team House, Blandford, Dorset, DT11 7FG, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Amberley Labels is part of the Coveris Group. Established in Blandford in Dorset in the early 1980s, Amberley Labels have been manufacturing decorative solutions for leading global brands for over 40 years. Continued investment in pioneering production technology has long established the Blandford site as a leader in digital print, achieving multiple award wins, industry accolades and some of the world’s most iconic brand campaigns. Amberley joined Coveris’ pan-European packaging group in 2019 as its luxury labels brand and has since incorporated Coveris’ Tenens Way Labels site in Boston within its distinct brand offer.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DWS Printing and Packaging

89 North Industry Court, Deer Park, New York, 11729, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1865, DWS is a 5th generation, family owned and operated printing company specializing in labels for the beverage, craft beer and food markets. The company is run by the Staib family and led by Andy Staib and his nephew, TJ Staib. Capabilities include shrink sleeves, pressure-sensitive, cut-and-stack, and roll-fed labels, as well as in-house can-sleeving and complete label & packaging design. Located in Deer Park, New York, DWS has a national client base and ships coast-to-coast as well as to Canada and Puerto Rico. Unlike many of its larger competitors, DWS continues to do business on a personal, Face-to-Face basis. DWS prides itself on the partnerships that evolve with its clients and on the relationships that are built over time. The people that make up the DWS Team are in fact, the DWS Family. The Staibs proudly treat each and every team member like family. The company continues to invest in technology. Staying status quo is not an option. And failure is not an option. Recent capital investments include a brand new Digital+Flexo Hybrid press, as well as a Heidelberg 8/Color UV offset press (fondly referred to as "The Beast"​) and an Omet 10/Color Flexographic press (also known as "Beauty"​). Other equipment includes its Nilpeter 8/Color Flexo press and two brand new Polar guillotine machines. The combination of DWS'​ heritage, long-standing values, client relationships and team members have made DWS one of the fast growing companies in the label & packaging arena. After 159 years of continuous operation, the Staibs feel like they're just getting started.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amberley-adhesive-labels-ltd.jpeg
Amberley Labels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dws-printing-associates.jpeg
DWS Printing and Packaging
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amberley Labels
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DWS Printing and Packaging
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amberley Labels in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DWS Printing and Packaging in 2025.

Incident History — Amberley Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amberley Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DWS Printing and Packaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DWS Printing and Packaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amberley-adhesive-labels-ltd.jpeg
Amberley Labels
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dws-printing-associates.jpeg
DWS Printing and Packaging
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Amberley Labels company and DWS Printing and Packaging company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, DWS Printing and Packaging company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Amberley Labels company.

In the current year, DWS Printing and Packaging company and Amberley Labels company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DWS Printing and Packaging company nor Amberley Labels company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DWS Printing and Packaging company nor Amberley Labels company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DWS Printing and Packaging company nor Amberley Labels company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Amberley Labels company nor DWS Printing and Packaging company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Amberley Labels nor DWS Printing and Packaging holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Amberley Labels company nor DWS Printing and Packaging company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Amberley Labels company employs more people globally than DWS Printing and Packaging company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Amberley Labels nor DWS Printing and Packaging holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amberley Labels nor DWS Printing and Packaging holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amberley Labels nor DWS Printing and Packaging holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amberley Labels nor DWS Printing and Packaging holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amberley Labels nor DWS Printing and Packaging holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amberley Labels nor DWS Printing and Packaging holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L