Comparison Overview

Amber Signs & Print

VS

Kingsdown

Amber Signs & Print

59 Gossoms End, Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire, HP4 1DF, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Welcome To Amber Signs & Print of Hertfordshire Amber Signs and Print is a well established Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire based business. We have experienced, skilled designers, graphic artists and fitters to look after all aspects of your of your project, from initial conception to final completion to the very highest standards. We pride ourselves on providing the full package for all sizes of company, whether it be branding and advertising for larger companies or complete corporate identity for new and fledgeling businesses, including fascias, vehicle livery and stationary. We aim to provide our expertise at very competitive prices and our portfolio shows our significant and diverse customer base, and why people keep coming back... Please take a minute to browse our website, and feel free to contact us for a quote.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kingsdown

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

Kingsdown are based in the heart of Bristol but we can look after all your design, print, mailing, fulfilment/ distribution requirements wherever you may be. We offer: Creative design solutions Fast and accurate pre print techniques Top class colour management Consistent print results State of the art finishing technology Pre print to mailing service Skilled and committed staff An environmental philosophy

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amber-signs-print.jpeg
Amber Signs & Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Kingsdown
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amber Signs & Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kingsdown
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amber Signs & Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kingsdown in 2025.

Incident History — Amber Signs & Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amber Signs & Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kingsdown (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kingsdown cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amber-signs-print.jpeg
Amber Signs & Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Kingsdown
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kingsdown company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Amber Signs & Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kingsdown company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Amber Signs & Print company.

In the current year, Kingsdown company and Amber Signs & Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kingsdown company nor Amber Signs & Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kingsdown company nor Amber Signs & Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kingsdown company nor Amber Signs & Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Kingsdown company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Kingsdown holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Amber Signs & Print company nor Kingsdown company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kingsdown company employs more people globally than Amber Signs & Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Kingsdown holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Kingsdown holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Kingsdown holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Kingsdown holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Kingsdown holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amber Signs & Print nor Kingsdown holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N